Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.0K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CRISPR Screening in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Tumor Progression to Immune Evasion and Therapeutic Resistance.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Genome-Wide CRISPR Screening Identifies Genetic Modulators of Amyloid Precursor Protein Processing.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

CRISPR Applications in Alzheimer's Disease: From High-Throughput Genetic Screening to Precision Editing and CNS Delivery.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

ATP-Responsive Bimetallic Metal-Organic Frameworks Amplify Oxidative Stress in the Tumor Microenvironment for Synergistic Chemo-Immunotherapy.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2026
Same author

Functional CRISPR Screens Define Genetic Drivers for Cancer Transformation and Progression from Non-Cancerous Cells.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Harmonizing single-cell 3D genome data with STARK and scNucleome.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

A human-specific genetic modifier reconfigures large-scale cortical network dynamics underlying behavioral performance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> uses a eukaryotic-like uridyltransferase to make UDP-GlcNAc for cell wall synthesis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamic redistribution of eIF4F controls cap-dependent translation initiation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

When does additional information improve accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Normative brain-state trajectories reveal deviation from healthy aging in Alzheimer's disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Noradrenergic infraslow rhythm during sleep is the critical link between heart-rate dynamics and memory consolidation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.4K

A comprehensive benchmark for multiple highly efficient base editors with broad targeting scope.

Xiaofeng Wang1,2,3,4, Xiaolong Cheng5,6, Zexu Li1,2,3,4

  • 1Key Laboratory of Bioresource Research and Development of Liaoning Province, College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, China.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|January 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a deep learning model, BEEP, to predict base editor (BE) efficiency for gene editing. BEEP enables precise targeting of disease-associated variants, including those previously considered uneditable.

Keywords:
CRISPRbase editingbase editorbenchmarkdeep learningscreen

More Related Videos

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.5K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.4K
A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.5K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Selecting optimal base editors (BEs) and guide RNAs (gRNAs) for specific gene editing targets is challenging due to an expanding toolkit.
  • Understanding BE editing profiles and properties is crucial for efficient and accurate genetic modification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct and evaluate a comprehensive set of adenine and cytosine base editors.
  • To build a predictive model for base editing efficiency and outcomes.
  • To experimentally validate the use of base editors for disease-associated variants and explore large-scale variant modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed 10 high-activity adenine and cytosine base editors.
  • Evaluated 34,040 base editor-gRNA-target combinations using long targets and tiling gRNAs.
  • Developed a deep learning model (BEEP) for predicting editing efficiency and outcome.
  • Experimentally validated base editor performance on 3,558 disease-associated single nucleotide variants (SNVs).

Main Results:

  • Observed widespread non-canonical protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) for tested base editors.
  • BEEP accurately predicted editing efficiency and outcome, enabling targeting of previously 'uneditable' sites.
  • Successfully installed 3,558 disease-associated SNVs, including 20.1% lacking canonical PAMs.
  • Predicted candidate base editor-gRNA-target combinations for 1,752,651 ClinVar SNVs.
  • Identified cancer-associated SNVs linked to BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma.

Conclusions:

  • The developed base editors and BEEP model offer a powerful resource for interrogating functional SNVs.
  • This approach expands the scope of base editing, making previously inaccessible targets editable.
  • A freely accessible webserver aids researchers in selecting optimal base editors and gRNAs for gene editing applications.