Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
Comparison of the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical neuromuscular
Takaya Maeda1, Hideki Yoshida2, Yuji Wakai3
1Department of Rehabilitation, Hirosaki Memorial Hospital: 59-1 Sakaizeki Nishida, Hirosaki-shi, Aomori 036-8076, Japan.
Abstract:
[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation on pain relief and knee function following total knee arthroplasty. [Participants and Methods] This was a prospective, single-center, three-group parallel study. Thirty-five patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were divided into transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation, and control groups. Interventions began on postoperative day 3 and continued for two weeks. Pain intensity during walking, maximum walking speed, timed up-and-go test, and isometric knee extension strength were assessed preoperatively, and two and four weeks postoperatively. [Results] Two weeks postoperatively, pain during walking was lower in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group than in other groups, and maximum walking speed was significantly faster in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group than in the microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation group but not in the control group. Timed up-and-go and isometric knee extension strength improvements were observed gradually but were not significantly different between the groups. [Conclusion] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectively relieved pain and improved walking speed early after total knee arthroplasty, whereas microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation did not show significant benefits compared to the control.

