Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
Comparing Different Data Partitioning Strategies for Segmenting Areas Affected by COVID-19 in CT Scans.
Anne de Souza Oliveira1, Marly Guimarães Fernandes Costa1, João Pedro Guimarães Fernandes Costa2
1R&D Center in Electronic and Information Technology, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69077-000, Brazil.
The slice strategy for automatic COVID-19 segmentation using deep neural networks showed slightly better performance than the CT-scan strategy. Automatic segmentation accuracy was comparable to radiologist interobserver agreement.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Pulmonary Diseases
Background:
- Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis.
- Computed tomography (CT) imaging is crucial for confirming diagnoses in symptomatic patients with negative RT-PCR results.
- Accurate segmentation of COVID-19 affected lung areas in CT scans is essential for diagnosis and monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate automatic segmentation methods for COVID-19 areas in CT scans using deep neural networks.
- To compare the performance of automatic segmentation with manual segmentation and interobserver agreement among radiologists.
- To assess the impact of different data partitioning strategies (CT-scan vs. slice) on segmentation accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two datasets and two deep neural network architectures, including U-Net and a novel architecture.
- Implemented both manual and automatic lung segmentation techniques.
- Evaluated segmentation performance using Dice metrics under CT-scan and slice strategies.
Main Results:
- Automatic segmentation achieved Dice metrics of 73.01% (CT-scan strategy) and 84.66% (slice strategy) with automatic lung segmentation.
- With manual lung segmentation, Dice metrics for COVID-19 segmentation were 74.47% (CT-scan) and 85.35% (slice).
- No statistically significant difference was found between automatic segmentation performance and interobserver agreement in a subset of 7 CT scans.
Conclusions:
- The slice strategy demonstrated slightly superior performance for COVID-19 segmentation compared to the CT-scan strategy.
- Automatic segmentation performance closely matched interobserver agreement among radiologists, suggesting its clinical utility.
- Deep learning models show promise for automated analysis of COVID-19 in CT imaging.
More Related Videos
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT