Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

10:25
Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
Published on: November 11, 2022
8.5K
Comparison of Vendor-Pretrained and Custom-Trained Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Head-and-Neck, Breast, and
Xinru Chen1,2, Yao Zhao1, Hana Baroudi1,2
1Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 8, 2025
Summary
Custom deep learning models significantly improve cancer segmentation accuracy compared to vendor-pretrained models. Even a small amount of institutional data can customize models for better performance in head-and-neck, breast, and prostate imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical imaging analysis
- Artificial intelligence in oncology
- Radiotherapy planning
Background:
- Commercial deep learning (DL) models for medical image segmentation often show variable performance.
- Institutional data and clinical practices can influence the effectiveness of these DL segmentation tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of local patient and clinical characteristics on the performance of commercial deep learning segmentation models.
- To compare the performance of vendor-pretrained versus custom-trained DL models for head-and-neck, breast, and prostate cancers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized clinical CT scans and contours from 210 patients across four cancer types.
- Trained and validated four custom DL segmentation models using institutional data.
- Assessed performance of both vendor-pretrained and custom-trained models using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Mean Surface Distance (MSD).
Main Results:
- Custom-trained models demonstrated superior performance over vendor-pretrained models for 14 out of 24 organs at risk.
- Significant improvements in DSC and MSD were observed for breast and prostate cancer segmentation with custom models.
- Average DSC for custom models: HN (0.86), breast (0.80), prostate (0.92) vs. vendor models: HN (0.81), breast (0.67), prostate (0.87).
Conclusions:
- Institutional data variations significantly impact the performance of vendor-pretrained DL segmentation models.
- Customizing DL models with even limited institutional data can achieve sufficient accuracy for clinical applications.
- Tailoring DL segmentation models is crucial for optimizing their implementation in radiotherapy planning.

