Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain PPOP
Published on: January 27, 2010
Effect of Anesthetic Modality on Decision-to-Delivery Interval and Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Category 2 and 3
Polona Pečlin1,2, Maja Pavlica1, Mirjam Druškovič1,2
1Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Background/Objectives: The optimal anesthetic technique for category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries remains debated, with concerns about impacts on decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and perinatal outcomes. This study examined the influence of epidural, spinal, and general anesthesia on DDI, surgical and postoperative complications, and neonatal outcomes. Methods: This prospective cohort study at a tertiary perinatology center enrolled parturient women undergoing category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries. Three DDI phases were assessed for each anesthetic modality: transfer time (decision for cesarean section to admission in the operation room), anesthetic time (admission to incision), and delivery time (incision to delivery of the neonate). The surgical procedure time (incision to closure), neonatal (5 min Apgar score, umbilical artery pH/base excess, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission) and maternal (blood loss, surgical and postoperative complications) outcomes were also analyzed for each group. Results: There were 215 women (122 category 2 and 93 category 3) included. The use of epidural and general anesthesia was associated with significantly shortened DDI compared to spinal anesthesia (p < 0.001). This difference was due prolonged transfer (p < 0.05) and anesthetic times (p < 0.001), respectively. No cases of umbilical artery pH below 7 were observed in any group. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of umbilical artery pH between 7 and 7.10 or in base excess below -12 nmol/L (p = 0.416 and p = 0.865, respectively). NICU admission was higher with both general and spinal anesthesia (p = 0.021), but mainly due to a higher proportion of preterm births, both before the 32nd week (p = 0.033) and between the 32nd and 37th week of pregnancy (p < 0.001). General anesthesia was associated with higher maternal blood loss (p = 0.026) and a higher rate of postoperative complications (p = 0.006). Conclusions: In category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries, general and epidural anesthesia were associated with shorter DDI compared to spinal anesthesia with no differences in neonatal outcomes. General anesthesia was associated with a higher risk of maternal complications compared to neuraxial anesthetic techniques.
Background/Objectives: The optimal anesthetic technique for category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries remains debated, with concerns about impacts on decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and perinatal outcomes. This study examined the influence of epidural, spinal, and general anesthesia on DDI, surgical and postoperative complications, and neonatal outcomes. Methods: This prospective cohort study at a tertiary perinatology center enrolled parturient women undergoing category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries. Three DDI phases were assessed for each anesthetic modality: transfer time (decision for cesarean section to admission in the operation room), anesthetic time (admission to incision), and delivery time (incision to delivery of the neonate). The surgical procedure time (incision to closure), neonatal (5 min Apgar score, umbilical artery pH/base excess, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission) and maternal (blood loss, surgical and postoperative complications) outcomes were also analyzed for each group. Results: There were 215 women (122 category 2 and 93 category 3) included. The use of epidural and general anesthesia was associated with significantly shortened DDI compared to spinal anesthesia (p < 0.001). This difference was due prolonged transfer (p < 0.05) and anesthetic times (p < 0.001), respectively. No cases of umbilical artery pH below 7 were observed in any group. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of umbilical artery pH between 7 and 7.10 or in base excess below -12 nmol/L (p = 0.416 and p = 0.865, respectively). NICU admission was higher with both general and spinal anesthesia (p = 0.021), but mainly due to a higher proportion of preterm births, both before the 32nd week (p = 0.033) and between the 32nd and 37th week of pregnancy (p < 0.001). General anesthesia was associated with higher maternal blood loss (p = 0.026) and a higher rate of postoperative complications (p = 0.006). Conclusions: In category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries, general and epidural anesthesia were associated with shorter DDI compared to spinal anesthesia with no differences in neonatal outcomes. General anesthesia was associated with a higher risk of maternal complications compared to neuraxial anesthetic techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Stages of General Anesthesia
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview

