Comparison of CytoSorb and Jafron HA330 Hemoadsorption Devices in Pediatric Oncological Patients with Sepsis:...

Background: Pediatric sepsis presents a severe risk to immunocompromised children, especially those with cancer or pre-existing conditions, posing a significant threat to their lives. Cytokine hemadsorption has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for managing sepsis and severe inflammatory conditions in critically ill patients. This innovative method involves eliminating pro-inflammatory cytokines from the bloodstream, targeting the underlying hyper-inflammatory response often seen in critical illnesses. Study aim: The study aim is to examine and compare the efficacy of HA330 and CytoSorb for extracorporeal blood purification in septic children with oncology. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we examine 20 cases to assess the effectiveness of hemoperfusion therapy using hemoadsorption devices in pediatric septic patients with oncology. Our focus is on the use of HA330 and Cytosorb hemoadsorption devices, both designed to remove bacterial toxins and inflammatory agents from the bloodstream. Results: Our study reveals that hemoadsorption with HA330 and CytoSorb effectively treats septic children with oncological conditions. Conclusions: The presented findings suggest no statistically significant difference between the two devices in reducing the levels of the assessed parameters for extracorporeal blood purification in this patient population.