Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

812
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
812
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

62.5K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
62.5K
Significant Figures in Calculations00:58

Significant Figures in Calculations

10.4K
Uncertainty in measurements can be avoided by reporting the results of a calculation with the correct number of significant figures. This can be determined by the following rules for rounding numbers:
10.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coronary Flow Reserve in Adults: Pathophysiology, Assessment Modalities, Clinical Applications, and Prognostic Significance.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Association of Statin Use with Reduced Primary Liver Cancer Risk, Independent of Age and Cirrhosis Protection in MASLD.

Cancers·2026
Same author

The Epidemiologic Comparison of Two Correlated Relative Risks: A Simple but Efficient Clinical Trial Design for Assessing Risk-Reduction and Treatment Significance.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Twenty Year History of Cancer Informatics (CiX) - A Long and Established Legacy of Quality Research and Scientific Advances in the Field of Oncology.

Cancer informatics·2025
Same author

Pathogenic mechanisms and etiologic aspects of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subspecies <i>paratuberculosis</i> as an infectious cause of cutaneous melanoma.

MedComm - Oncology·2024
Same author

The use of PCSK9 inhibitors should be avoided during pregnancy: results from a Mendelian randomization study.

European journal of preventive cardiology·2024
Same journal

Correction: Iliuta et al. Impact of Pulmonary Hypertension on Mortality After Surgery for Aortic Stenosis. <i>Medicina</i> 2022, <i>58</i>, 1231.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Value of BUN-Based Ratios for Mortality and Prolonged Hospitalization in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison with Established Risk Scores.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same journal

One-Year Comparative Outcomes of Conventional Versus Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Intestinal Mucosa in Long-Standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Consequences of Chronic Inflammation and Endoscopic Approaches to Diagnosis and Management.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same journal

Biological and Metabolic Correlates of Psychological Resilience in Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Exploratory Gender-Based Study.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same journal

Influence of Mitral Annular Calcification Assessed by Cardiac Computed Tomography on Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K

Epidemiology of Rounding Error.

Jimmy T Efird1,2

  • 1Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Boston, Lafayette City Center, 2 Avenue de Lafayette, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
|January 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Properly rounding numbers minimizes data errors in epidemiological studies. Awareness of rounding and truncation errors ensures research integrity and accurate findings.

Keywords:
accuracydata truncationepidemiologyprecisionrelative effect estimationrisk reductionrounding error

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Rounding numbers involves a trade-off between information loss and excessive precision.
  • Inexact rounding and data truncation can introduce significant numeric errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical importance of accurate number rounding in research.
  • To reduce errors in epidemiological studies caused by rounding and data truncation.
  • To prevent misleading findings and ensure the credibility of study results.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses the principles of numerical rounding and data truncation.
  • It examines the impact of these processes on data accuracy.
  • Heuristic examples are used to illustrate consequences in epidemiological contexts.

Main Results:

  • Improper rounding or truncation compromises study credibility and can lead to false discoveries.
  • Sequential computations with rounded numbers can propagate errors, yielding inaccurate results.
  • Understanding and preventing rounding errors enhances research integrity.

Conclusions:

  • Appropriate rounding is essential for minimizing error and maintaining data integrity.
  • Awareness of rounding and truncation error impacts epidemiological study reliability.
  • Implementing preventive measures ensures more accurate and trustworthy research conclusions.