Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
Comparison of Sulfamethoxazole Removal Efficiency Using Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane Modified by Various
Asunción María Hidalgo1, María Dolores Murcia1, María Gómez1
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry, Campus of Espinardo, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
This study modified ultrafiltration membranes with reduced graphene oxide (rGO), chitosan, and MgCl2 to remove sulfamethoxazole (SMX). The rGO-modified membrane showed the highest SMX rejection, indicating improved contaminant removal efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Environmental Engineering
- Chemical Engineering
Background:
- Membrane modification is crucial for enhancing treatment effectiveness and reducing fouling.
- Emerging contaminants like sulfamethoxazole (SMX) pose environmental challenges.
- Ultrafiltration membranes require improved performance for contaminant removal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To modify ultrafiltration membranes using reduced graphene oxide (rGO), chitosan, and MgCl2.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of these modified membranes in removing sulfamethoxazole (SMX).
- To investigate the impact of modification on membrane permeability, pollutant rejection, and fouling.
Main Methods:
- Membrane modification using rGO, chitosan, and MgCl2.
- Surface characterization via Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and SEM-EDX.
- Ultrafiltration experiments to assess sulfamethoxazole (SMX) removal under varying pressure and concentration.
- Permeability coefficient (Aw) and rejection rate measurements.
- Fouling studies to analyze pore blockage.
Main Results:
- Modified membranes exhibited lower permeability coefficients (Aw) than the native membrane.
- The rGO-modified membrane achieved the highest sulfamethoxazole (SMX) rejection due to increased hydrophilicity.
- Native membranes had higher permeate flux values compared to modified ones.
- Fouling was predominantly observed after pollutant passage, causing pore blockage.
Conclusions:
- Membrane modification with rGO, chitosan, and MgCl2 alters membrane properties, impacting performance.
- rGO modification enhances sulfamethoxazole (SMX) removal efficiency.
- Understanding fouling mechanisms is key to optimizing membrane-based water treatment processes.
More Related Videos
12:11A Modified EPA Method 1623 that Uses Tangential Flow Hollow-fiber Ultrafiltration and Heat Dissociation Steps to Detect Waterborne Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp.
Published on: July 9, 2012
07:32Synthesis of Hydrogels with Antifouling Properties As Membranes for Water Purification
Published on: April 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Drug Elimination by Renal Route: Tubular Secretion
Detergent Purification of Membrane Proteins