Investigating the Effects of Microclimate on Arboviral Kinetics in Aedes aegypti

Erik A Turner1, Samantha D Clark1, Víctor Hugo Peña-García2,3

  • 1Department of Pathobiological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

PubMed

Insights

Microclimate temperatures significantly impact chikungunya virus (CHIKV) transmission dynamics in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, influencing outbreak peaks and timing. Zika virus (ZIKV) showed less pronounced differences, highlighting the need for microclimate data in arbovirus risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Arbovirology
  • Epidemiology
  • Vector-borne disease research

Background:

  • Aedes aegypti mosquitoes transmit arboviruses like Zika (ZIKV) and chikungunya (CHIKV).
  • Standard models use meteorological temperature, not microclimate data, for transmission predictions.
  • Microclimate temperature variations (indoor vs. outdoor) may affect virus dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of indoor and outdoor microclimate temperature profiles on ZIKV and CHIKV infection in Aedes aegypti.
  • To assess how these microclimate differences influence viral infection, dissemination, and simulated outbreak patterns.
  • To evaluate the role of microenvironmental factors in arbovirus vectorial capacity and risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Collected temperature data from Neiva, Colombia, representing indoor and outdoor microclimates.
  • Exposed Aedes aegypti mosquitoes to ZIKV and CHIKV under different temperature profiles.
  • Analyzed vector mortality, infection, dissemination rates, and viral titers.
  • Developed a stochastic SEIR-SEI model to simulate outbreak dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Vector mortality and general infection/dissemination rates were largely unaffected by temperature profiles.
  • ZIKV showed increased infection and abdominal titers at outdoor temperatures at 21 days post-infection (dpi).
  • CHIKV showed significant abdominal titer differences at 7 and 14 dpi.
  • Simulated CHIKV outbreaks showed higher peaks and faster timing under indoor conditions compared to outdoor.
  • Simulated ZIKV outbreaks showed high transmission probability but fewer cases regardless of microclimate.

Conclusions:

  • Microclimate temperature significantly influences CHIKV transmission dynamics and outbreak potential, with indoor conditions favoring higher and faster transmission.
  • While ZIKV infection kinetics showed minor differences, CHIKV dynamics were more sensitive to microenvironmental temperature variations.
  • Understanding microclimate temperature is crucial for accurate arbovirus risk assessment and predicting transmission patterns.
  • These findings emphasize the importance of considering microenvironmental factors beyond general meteorological data in vector-borne disease modeling.