Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 15, 2016
Personalized Clustering for Emotion Recognition Improvement
Laura Gutiérrez-Martín1, Celia López-Ongil1,2, Jose M Lanza-Gutiérrez3
1Departamento de Tecnología Electrónica, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avenida de la Universidad, 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.
Abstract:
Emotion recognition through artificial intelligence and smart sensing of physical and physiological signals (affective computing) is achieving very interesting results in terms of accuracy, inference times, and user-independent models. In this sense, there are applications related to the safety and well-being of people (sexual assaults, gender-based violence, children and elderly abuse, mental health, etc.) that require even more improvements. Emotion detection should be done with fast, discrete, and non-luxurious systems working in real time and real life (wearable devices, wireless communications, battery-powered). Furthermore, emotional reactions to violence are not equal in all people. Then, large general models cannot be applied to a multi-user system for people protection, and health and social workers and law enforcement agents would welcome customized and lightweight AI models. These semi-personalized models will be applicable to clusters of subjects sharing similarities in their emotional reactions to external stimuli. This customization requires several steps: creating clusters of subjects with similar behaviors, creating AI models for every cluster, continually updating these models with new data, and enrolling new subjects in clusters when required. An initial approach for clustering labeled data compiled (physiological data, together with emotional labels) is presented in this work, as well as the method to ensure the enrollment of new users with unlabeled data once the AI models are generated. The idea is that this complete methodology can be exportable to any other expert systems where unlabeled data are added during in-field operation and different profiles exist in terms of data. Experimental results demonstrate an improvement of 5% in accuracy and 4% in F1 score with respect to our baseline general model, along with a 32% to 58% reduction in variability, respectively.
Related Concept Videos
Labeling Emotion
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Emotional Expression
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Empathy

