Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

07:41
Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
1.8K
Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy in Cold and Dry Patients
Dimitrios Varrias1, Amrita Balgobind2, Israel Safiriyu3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (D.V., M.A.D.A.).
Circulation. Heart Failure
|January 8, 2025
Summary
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy offers milder functional improvements for "cold and dry" heart failure patients, but with similar survival and adverse event rates compared to "cold and wet" patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- End-stage heart failure patients with low pulmonary capillary wedge pressure are termed "cold and dry."
- This subgroup is understudied, and the benefits of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy remain unclear.
- Understanding their outcomes is crucial for optimizing mechanical circulatory support strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of "cold and dry" versus "cold and wet" patients undergoing LVAD implantation.
- To evaluate the impact of LVADs on survival, functional capacity, and quality of life in these distinct patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of adult LVAD recipients (2006-2017) from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.
- Classification into "cold and wet" (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >15 mm Hg) and "cold and dry" (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg) based on pre-LVAD hemodynamics.
- Primary outcome: 1-year survival; secondary outcomes: rehospitalizations, functional capacity (6-minute walk test), and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, EuroQol questionnaire).
Main Results:
- The study included 10,310 patients; "cold and dry" patients (15% of cohort) had better baseline renal function, functional capacity, and quality of life.
- While both groups showed improvements post-LVAD, "cold and dry" patients experienced milder gains in quality of life and functional capacity.
- No significant differences were observed in 1-year hospitalizations, adverse events, or mortality between the "cold and dry" and "cold and wet" groups.
Conclusions:
- LVAD therapy provides significant, albeit milder, improvements in functional capacity and quality of life for "cold and dry" end-stage heart failure patients.
- Survival and adverse event rates at 1 year are comparable between "cold and dry" and "cold and wet" LVAD recipients.
- These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment approaches for heart failure patients based on hemodynamic profiles.

