SF3B1: from core splicing factor to oncogenic driver

Pedro Bak-Gordon1, James L Manley2

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.

RNA (New York, N.Y.)
|January 8, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Highly recurrent SF3B1 mutations drive cancer by disrupting pre-mRNA splicing. Aberrant splicing of specific transcripts promotes cancer initiation and progression, offering therapeutic targets.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Genetics
  • RNA Splicing

Background:

  • Somatic mutations in SF3B1, a core splicing factor, are prevalent drivers across various cancer types.
  • SF3B1 functions as a scaffold protein, crucial for spliceosome assembly and accurate pre-mRNA splicing, particularly branchsite recognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which oncogenic SF3B1 mutations disrupt splicing.
  • To discuss the role of SF3B1-mutant-specific aberrant splicing in cancer initiation and progression.
  • To highlight the prognostic significance of SF3B1 mutations for targeted therapy development.

Main Methods:

  • Review of molecular mechanisms underlying SF3B1-mediated splicing disruption.
  • Analysis of transcriptomic alterations in SF3B1-mutant cancer cells.
  • Correlation of SF3B1 mutation status with cancer phenotypes and prognosis.

Main Results:

  • SF3B1 mutations perturb early spliceosomal complexes, leading to alternative branchpoint activation and cryptic 3' splice site selection.
  • Aberrantly spliced transcripts in SF3B1-mutant cancers contribute to tumorigenesis.
  • Distinct SF3B1 mutations correlate with specific disease phenotypes and prognostic outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding SF3B1's role in splicing disruption is key to comprehending its oncogenic potential.
  • Targeting SF3B1-mutant-specific splicing defects presents a promising therapeutic strategy.
  • Further research into SF3B1 mutation-driven cancer biology is critical for clinical advancements.

Related Concept Videos

Alternative RNA Splicing02:18

Alternative RNA Splicing

3.7K
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes01:33

Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes

Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
8.7K
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell02:21

Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell

Cancer arises from mutations in the critical genes that allow healthy cells to escape cell cycle regulation and acquire the ability to proliferate indefinitely. Though originating from a single mutation event in one of the originator cells, cancer progresses when the mutant cell lines continue to gain more and more mutations, and finally, become malignant. For example, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) develops initially as a non-lethal increase in white blood cells, which progressively...
11.5K
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
7.3K
Chromatin Structure and RNA Splicing02:41

Chromatin Structure and RNA Splicing

2.7K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.0K