Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
The Psychometric Properties of the EuroQol 5D Five Level in Survivors of Critical Illness
Sheraya De Silva1, Ary Serpa Neto1,2,3,4, Aditya Sathe1,5
1Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Objectives:
The EuroQol 5D five level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument is a standardized measure of health-related quality of life and is routinely used in survivors of critical illness. However, information on its psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in this patient group is lacking.
Design:
Secondary analysis of data from the previously published PREDICT (a registry in critically ill patients to determine predictors of disability-free survival) study, a prospective, multicenter cohort study.
Setting:
Six ICUs in the state of Victoria, Australia.
Patients:
Four hundred fifty adult patients admitted to the ICU and ventilated for over 24 hours.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
The EQ-5D-5L was administered by telephone at 6 months following ICU admission. Internal consistency (inter-item correlations, Cronbach's α, and split-half reliability coefficients), construct validity (against age, body mass index, and other outcome measures), responsiveness (observing change over time and effect sizes), percentage of participants presenting no change, and MCID (triangulation of distribution-based and anchor-based estimates) were evaluated. The EQ-5D-5L showed high internal consistency, Cronbach α coefficients of 0.82 (between dimensions) and 0.79 (between the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-VAS] and utility score), and average split-half coefficients of 0.79 each (between dimensions and between EQ-VAS and utility score). Construct validity was confirmed with a strong correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (EQ-VAS: r = 0.72; p < 0.001 and utility score: r = 0.81; p < 0.001). Effect sizes for change over time for EQ-VAS and utility score were low. The final MCID estimates were 10 (EQ-VAS) and 0.11 (utility score).
Conclusions:
The EQ-5D-5L, using the Australian value set, demonstrated evidence of good internal consistency and validity, but poor responsiveness in a critically ill population.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cochran's Q Test