Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

07:51
Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022
1.6K
Differentiation Between Pellucid-Like Keratoconus and Pellucid Marginal Degeneration Using Swept-Source Optical
Janine Lenk1, Robert Herber, Lutz E Pillunat
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Cornea
|January 8, 2025
Summary
Distinguishing pellucid-like keratoconus (PLK) from pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (PMD) is challenging. While standard tomographic and biomechanical tests are insufficient, swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) aids differentiation by revealing characteristic limbal thinning in PLK.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Imaging
- Biomechanical Analysis
Background:
- Pellucid-like keratoconus (PLK) and pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (PMD) are corneal ectasias with overlapping clinical presentations.
- Accurate differentiation is crucial for appropriate patient management and treatment planning.
- Current tomographic and biomechanical assessments often struggle to reliably distinguish between PLK and PMD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in differentiating PLK from PMD.
- To compare corneal tomographic and biomechanical parameters between PLK and PMD groups classified by SS-OCT.
Main Methods:
- Patients were classified into PLK (n=30) and PMD (n=10) groups using SS-OCT imaging.
- Corneal thickness was measured at multiple positions using SS-OCT.
- Tomographic, densitometric, and biomechanical parameters were assessed using Scheimpflug-based methods.
Main Results:
- The PMD group was significantly older than the PLK group (P=0.002).
- Astigmatism was significantly higher in the PMD group compared to the PLK group (P<0.001).
- No significant differences were found in Kmax or biomechanical parameters (e.g., CBI) between the groups (P>0.05).
- Significant differences in corneal thickness ratios were observed inferiorly and at the 6 and 7 o'clock positions between PLK and PMD (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Scheimpflug-based tomographic and biomechanical parameters alone cannot reliably differentiate between PLK and PMD.
- SS-OCT is valuable for distinguishing PLK from PMD due to its ability to detect characteristic peripheral corneal thinning.
- Peripheral corneal pachymetry analysis using SS-OCT aids in the differential diagnosis of these conditions.

