Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples
Published on: January 13, 2023
Challenges in blood fractionation for cancer liquid biopsy: how can microfluidics assist?
Robert Salomon1,2, Sajad Razavi Bazaz1, Kirk Mutafopulos3
1Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, Australia. rsalomon@ccia.org.au.
Abstract:
Liquid biopsy provides a minimally invasive approach to characterise the molecular and phenotypic characteristics of a patient's individual tumour by detecting evidence of cancerous change in readily available body fluids, usually the blood. When applied at multiple points during the disease journey, it can be used to monitor a patient's response to treatment and to personalise clinical management based on changes in disease burden and molecular findings. Traditional liquid biopsy approaches such as quantitative PCR, have tended to look at only a few biomarkers, and are aimed at early detection of disease or disease relapse using predefined markers. With advances in the next generation sequencing (NGS) and single-cell genomics, simultaneous analysis of both circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumour cells (CTCs) is now a real possibility. To realise this, however, we need to overcome issues with current blood collection and fractionation processes. These include overcoming the need to add a preservative to the collection tube or the need to rapidly send blood tubes to a centralised processing lab with the infrastructure required to fractionate and process the blood samples. This review focuses on outlining the current state of liquid biopsy and how microfluidic blood fractionation tools can be used in cancer liquid biopsy. We describe microfluidic devices that can separate plasma for ctDNA analysis, and devices that are important in isolating the cellular component(s) in liquid biopsy, i.e., individual CTCs and CTC clusters. To facilitate a better understanding of these devices, we propose a new categorisation system based on how these devices operate. The three categories being 1) solid Interaction devices, 2) fluid Interaction devices and 3) external force/active devices. Finally, we conclude that whilst some assays and some cancers are well suited to current microfluidic techniques, new tools are necessary to support broader, clinically relevant multiomic workflows in cancer liquid biopsy.
More Related Videos
11:32A Microfluidic Platform for Precision Small-volume Sample Processing and Its Use to Size Separate Biological Particles with an Acoustic Microdevice
Published on: November 23, 2015
05:26A Standardized Liquid Biopsy Preanalytical Protocol for Downstream Circulating-Free DNA Applications
Published on: September 16, 2022