Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

935
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
935
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

872
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
872
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.0K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

956
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
956
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

864
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of...
864
Valence Bond Theory02:42

Valence Bond Theory

8.4K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
8.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The importance of direct exchange in Kitaev magnetism.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Transcorrelated methods for multireference problems.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Individual and Cooperative Superexchange Enhancement in Cuprates.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Aperiodic defects in periodic solids.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

FCIQMC-CASPT2 with Imaginary-Time-Averaged Wave Functions.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Toward a Stochastic Complete Active Space Second-Order Perturbation Theory.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2023
Same journal

Improving PCM in Protic Media: Markov State Models for TD-DFT Calculations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Efficient Coupled-Cluster Python Frameworks for Next-Generation GPUs: A Comparative Study of CuPy and PyTorch on the Hopper and Grace Hopper Architecture.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Extending the MARTINI 3 Coarse-Grained Force Field to Polypeptoids.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Statistical Mechanics of Density- and Temperature-Dependent Potentials: Application to Condensed Phases within GenDPDE.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

BFEE-Docking: A User-Friendly and Customizable End-to-End Tool from High-Throughput Virtual Screening to Binding Free-Energy Calculations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

On-the-Fly Trajectory Simulation of Two-Pulse, Three-Pulse, and Higher-Order Pump-Probe Signals.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.4K

Effective Hamiltonians from Spin-Adapted Configuration Interaction.

Arta A Safari1, Nikolay A Bogdanov1

  • 1Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|January 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a new method for extracting magnetic interactions in multi-site systems with local spins S ≥ 1. The approach uses effective Hamiltonians and graphical methods to analyze magnetic couplings, demonstrated on a [CaMn3(IV)O4] cubane.

More Related Videos

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

10.6K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.4K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

10.6K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Solid-state physics
  • Computational chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate modeling of magnetic interactions is crucial for understanding materials.
  • Existing methods for extracting magnetic couplings can be limited in scope.
  • Effective Hamiltonians provide a framework for simplifying complex quantum systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a generalized procedure for extracting magnetic interactions.
  • To apply this method to multi-site systems with local spins S ≥ 1.
  • To derive closed-form expressions for magnetic couplings in spin chains.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing effective Hamiltonians for magnetic interactions.
  • Employing the graphical method of angular momentum.
  • Performing ab initio calculations for extracting magnetic couplings.
  • Extending to nonsequential coupling schemes for enhanced symmetry analysis.

Main Results:

  • A generalized extraction procedure applicable to systems with S ≥ 1.
  • Closed, nonrecursive expressions for magnetic couplings in arbitrary equal spin chains.
  • Successful illustration of the method using [CaMn3(IV)O4] cubane.
  • Demonstration of how nonsequential coupling schemes reveal additional symmetries.

Conclusions:

  • The presented method offers a robust approach for analyzing magnetic interactions in complex spin systems.
  • The derived expressions simplify the calculation of magnetic couplings in spin chains.
  • The technique is valuable for computational materials science and condensed matter physics.
  • The extension to nonsequential schemes enhances the description of spin Hamiltonian symmetries.