Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: June 17, 2013
Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression: An electric field modeling meta-analysis
Yassine Yachou1, Noomane Bouaziz2, Gabriel Makdah3
1Mondor University Hospitals, INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de La Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), University of Paris Est Créteil, Équipe Neuropsychiatrie Translationnelle, Créteil, France; NeuroSpin, Neuroimaging Platform, CEA, UNIACT Lab, PsyBrain Team, Saclay, France.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) effectively treats depression, but outcomes vary. This study found that targeting frontopolar and orbitofrontal cortices, not just the L-DLPFC, improves tDCS effectiveness by considering individual brain anatomy.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Medical Engineering
Background:
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) shows promise for treating depression by modulating cortical activity.
- Inconsistent outcomes in tDCS depression treatment are linked to variable electrode montages and electric field strengths.
- Current meta-analyses often overlook the impact of montage and electric field distribution on treatment variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between electric field distribution, montage parameters, and clinical outcomes in tDCS for depression.
- To identify specific brain regions and electric field intensities associated with positive tDCS response in depression.
- To address inter-experimental variability by incorporating anatomical differences in head models.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis correlating clinical outcomes (effect size) with electric field intensities.
- Utilized 8 diverse head models to simulate electric field distribution across 29 studies (1766 patients, 2000-2023).
- Analyzed data considering montage heterogeneity and individual anatomical variability.
Main Results:
- tDCS demonstrated a significant overall effect on depression (Hedge's g = 0.66).
- Contrary to the intended L-DLPFC (BA 46) targeting, electric fields showed broad frontal lobe distribution with significant heterogeneity.
- A correlation between electric field strength and clinical outcomes was found in BA 10, BA 11, and anterior BA 46.
Conclusions:
- Targeting frontopolar prefrontal cortex (BA 10, BA 11) and orbitofrontal cortex (anterior BA 46) may be more effective for tDCS in depression.
- Individual anatomical variability and precise electric field modeling are crucial for optimizing tDCS treatment.
- Highlights the need for simulation-guided, personalized tDCS trials for depression management.
More Related Videos
11:26Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Device Development: An Updated Protocol Used at Home in Healthy Subjects and Fibromyalgia Patients
Published on: July 14, 2018
09:30Treating Clinical Depression with Repetitive Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using the Brainsway H1-coil
Published on: October 4, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...