Pesticide risk perception as an attitudinal mediator: Exploratory research with farm managers and consumers
- 1Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas, Laboratório Multidisciplinar em Alimentos e Saúde, Brazil.
- 2Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Brazil.
- 3Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade, Centro de Pesquisas e Práticas em Nutrição e Alimentação Coletiva, Brazil.
- 0Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas, Laboratório Multidisciplinar em Alimentos e Saúde, Brazil.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Risk perception significantly influences farmers' and consumers' decisions regarding pesticide use. Understanding this perception is key to promoting safer practices and informed purchasing choices for better environmental and health outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Environmental Science
- Agricultural Science
- Consumer Behavior
Background
- Pesticide use presents substantial human health and environmental risks.
- Public perception of pesticides is heavily influenced by risk perception.
- Understanding these perceptions is crucial for effective risk management and communication.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate the mediating role of risk perception in farm managers' pro-environmental attitudes.
- To examine risk perception and knowledge as mediators between consumer trust and purchase intentions.
- To analyze the influence of risk perception on farmer and consumer decision-making.
Main Methods
- Utilized the Norm Activation Model for farm managers and a trust model for consumers.
- Employed mediation models to analyze relationships between personal norms, risk perception, attitudes, trust, knowledge, and purchase intentions.
- Collected data via in-person questionnaires from 37 farm managers and 202 consumers in Brazil.
Main Results
- Risk perception partially mediated farm managers' pro-environmental attitudes.
- Consumers' purchase intentions were significantly influenced by risk perception, knowledge, and trust in the food system.
- Risk perception emerged as a critical factor for both studied groups.
Conclusions
- Targeted interventions, including public education and regulatory improvements, are necessary to address pesticide risks.
- Transparent communication strategies can enhance trust and influence consumer behavior.
- Findings highlight the importance of risk perception in shaping agricultural and consumer decisions.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
01:17
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
03:26
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...

