Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

5.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
5.8K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.4K
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

7.3K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
7.3K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

1.2K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
1.2K
Reducing Line Loss01:18

Reducing Line Loss

143
In a three-phase circuit, line loss is an indicator of energy dissipated as heat due to the resistance of transmission lines. To address this, incorporating transformers into the system—a step-up transformer at the source and a step-down transformer at the load—is a strategic solution. Two three-phase transformers are introduced to improve this.
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss...
143
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

5.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The potential acute and chronic toxicity of cyfluthrin on the soil model organism, Eisenia fetida.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2017
Same author

Ameliorative effect of vitamin E on hepatic oxidative stress and hypoimmunity induced by high-fat diet in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).

Fish & shellfish immunology·2017
Same author

Percutaneous Vascular Interventions Versus Bypass Surgeries in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.

Annals of surgery·2017
Same author

Silymarin protects against renal injury through normalization of lipid metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis in high fat-fed mice.

Free radical biology & medicine·2017
Same author

Effect of complications on oncologic outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

The Journal of surgical research·2017
Same author

Effect of crowding stress on the immune response in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) vaccinated with attenuated Edwardsiella tarda.

Fish & shellfish immunology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

8.9K

Learning with noisy labels via clean aware sharpness aware minimization.

Bin Huang1, Ying Xie2, Chaoyang Xu3

  • 1School of Business, Putian University, Putian, 351100, China.

Scientific Reports
|January 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Sharpness Aware Minimization (SAM) struggles with noisy labels. A new Clean Aware SAM (CA-SAM) algorithm improves generalization by identifying and prioritizing clean data for parameter perturbation, outperforming existing methods.

Keywords:
Deep neural networksLoss landscapeModel generalizationNoisy label learningSharpness aware minimization

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

463
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

8.9K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

463
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Leveraging large, imprecise datasets is crucial in machine learning.
  • Sharpness Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization with noisy labels via adversarial perturbations.
  • SAM's effectiveness is limited by challenges in identifying correct perturbations with noisy data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the generalization bottleneck in SAM caused by noisy labels.
  • To develop a novel algorithm that improves parameter perturbation strategies in the presence of label noise.
  • To enhance the robustness and performance of models trained on datasets with imperfect labels.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of parameter perturbation direction mismatch between clean and noisy samples.
  • Development of Clean Aware Sharpness Aware Minimization (CA-SAM) algorithm.
  • Dynamic data division into likely clean and noisy subsets based on model history.
  • Utilizing likely clean samples to guide parameter perturbation direction.
  • Searching for flat minima in the loss landscape to align noisy samples while preserving clean ones.

Main Results:

  • CA-SAM effectively identifies and utilizes likely clean samples to guide adversarial perturbations.
  • The algorithm successfully restricts gradient perturbation for noisy samples, aligning them with clean samples.
  • Comprehensive experiments on diverse benchmark datasets demonstrate CA-SAM's superior performance.
  • CA-SAM significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches in noisy label learning.

Conclusions:

  • CA-SAM offers a robust solution to the challenges of noisy label learning.
  • The proposed method enhances model generalization by effectively handling label noise.
  • CA-SAM represents a significant advancement in developing reliable machine learning models from imperfect data.