Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
6.5K
Is ADDM graft practical? A comparative study to evaluate ADDM graft in third molar surgery
Aashita Jain1, D S Gupta2, Nandakishore Donepudi2
1Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Morādābād, India. aashitajain1409@gmail.com.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
|January 9, 2025
Summary
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix (ADDM) effectively promotes bone density and reduces probing depth in third molar extraction sockets. While pain and swelling showed no significant difference, ADDM offers satisfactory outcomes for socket preservation.
Area of Science:
- Oral surgery
- Regenerative medicine
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Lower third molars (LTM) extraction sites can be grafted using autogenous demineralized dentin matrix (ADDM).
- ADDM is processed from extracted LTM, involving grinding, cleaning, sterilization, and demineralization.
- This study assesses ADDM's efficacy as a graft material in third molar extraction sockets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of ADDM as a graft material in extraction sockets.
- Assessments include pain, swelling, trismus, probing depth (PD), and bone density.
- Compare ADDM graft outcomes against conventional healing via blood clot formation.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted.
- Two groups were formed: Group A (45 patients) received ADDM graft with a bio-collagen membrane.
- Group B (45 patients) served as the control, with conventional healing after LTM removal.
Main Results:
- Swelling was significantly higher in the ADDM group (Test Group) compared to the control group on postoperative day seven.
- Probing depth at three months was significantly lower in the ADDM group (2.52 ± 0.641) than the control group (4.46 ± 1.252).
- Radiographical evaluation showed increased bone density in the ADDM group (135.81 ± 8.73) compared to the control group (121.59 ± 13.83) over three months. Pain and trismus showed no significant difference.
Conclusions:
- ADDM graft procedures demonstrate satisfactory clinical outcomes in extraction sockets.
- Preservation methods are crucial for maintaining periodontal pocket depth and alveolar ridge height post-extraction.
- ADDM shows potential as an effective bone graft material in oral surgery.

