Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Which items of the movement assessment battery for children are most sensitive for identifying children with probable
Evi Verbecque1, Marisja Denysschen2, Dané Coetzee2
1Rehabilitation Research Centre - REVAL, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Insights
This study identified specific Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (MABC-2) items most sensitive for detecting probable Developmental Coordination Disorder (p-DCD). Findings reveal item sensitivity varies by age, impacting early detection of motor skill difficulties.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Psychology
- Motor Development Research
- Clinical Assessment Tools
Background:
- The Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (MABC-2) is widely used for assessing child motor skills.
- However, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of individual MABC-2 items for identifying probable Developmental Coordination Disorder (p-DCD) remain largely unexamined.
- This gap limits precise identification of motor coordination deficits in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine which specific MABC-2 items are most sensitive in detecting p-DCD across different age bands.
- To evaluate the predictive value of individual MABC-2 items for identifying children with p-DCD.
- To enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the MABC-2 for p-DCD.
Main Methods:
- A large dataset of 4916 typically developing (TD) children and 822 children with p-DCD aged 3-16 years from European and African populations was analyzed.
- Hedges' g was calculated to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) between p-DCD and TD groups for each MABC-2 item.
- Logistic regression analysis assessed the sensitivity and specificity of raw MABC-2 item scores in predicting p-DCD within specific age bands.
Main Results:
- Age Band 1 (AB1): Threading beads and jumping on mats showed substantial differences (SMD ≥ 1.61). Overall sensitivity was 61.7%, specificity 98.6%.
- Age Band 2 (AB2): Walking heel-to-toe forwards was significantly poorer in p-DCD (SMD 1.65). Overall sensitivity was 79.0%, specificity 97.6%.
- Age Band 3 (AB3): Catching a ball (preferred/non-preferred hand) and walking heel-to-toe backwards demonstrated substantial poorer performance in p-DCD (SMD ≥ 1.61). Overall sensitivity reached 94.4%, specificity 99.6%.
Conclusions:
- Not all MABC-2 items possess equal discriminatory power between children with p-DCD and TD peers.
- While specificity remains high across age bands, sensitivity is only moderate in younger children (AB1-2), coinciding with the acquisition of culturally influenced motor skills.
- These findings highlight the need for careful item selection and interpretation in diagnosing p-DCD, particularly in early childhood.
Introduction:
Despite the widespread use of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (MABC-2), little is known about the sensitivity or specificity of the individual items to detect probable Developmental Coordination Disorder (p-DCD). This study examined which specific MABC-2 items were most sensitive to identify children with p-DCD and which items would predict p-DCD.
Methods:
Based on a large dataset including European and African children aged 3-16 years (n = 4916, typically developing (TD, 49.6 % boys); n = 822 p-DCD (53.1 % boys), Hedges' g was calculated to establish the standardized mean difference (SMD) between p-DCD/TD. SMDs were considered substantial when absolute values at or above 1.4. Sensitivity and specificity of the raw MABC-2 item scores predicting p-DCD/TD per age band (AB) were established with logistic regression analysis.
Results:
AB1: Children with p-DCD performed substantially poorer on threading beads (SMD: -1.61) and jumping on mats (SMD: 1.61). By combining all items and the country of origin, the sensitivity was 61.7 % and specificity 98.6 %. AB2: Walking heel-to-toe forwards (SMD: 1.65) was substantially poorer in p-DCD. By combining all items and the country of origin, the sensitivity was 79.0 % and specificity 97.6 %. AB3: Catching a ball with the preferred (SMD: 1.8) or non-preferred (SMD: 1.61) hand, and for walking heel-to-toe backwards (SMD: 1.78) were substantially poorer in p-DCD. All items combined resulted in a sensitivity of 94.4 % and specificity of 99.6 %.
Conclusion:
Not all MABC-2 items are equally sensitive to distinguish between performances of p-DCD and TD. Despite the good specificity, the sensitivity was only moderate in AB1-2, the age at which children learn culturally influenced motor skills.
More Related Videos
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016
07:25An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
Published on: February 12, 2018