Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
Consistency in Self-Reported Race-and-Ethnicity Over Time: Implications for Improving the Accuracy of Imputations and
Ann Haas1, Steven C Martino2, Amelia M Haviland1,3
1RAND, Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, Pittsburgh, PA.
Background:
Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (MBISG), which augments an imperfect race-and-ethnicity administrative variable to estimate probabilities that people would self-identify as being in each of 6 mutually exclusive racial-and-ethnic groups, performs very well for Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AA&NHPI), Black, Hispanic, and White race-and-ethnicity, somewhat less well for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and much less well for Multiracial race-and-ethnicity.
Objectives:
To assess whether temporal inconsistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity might limit improvements in approaches like MBISG.
Methods:
Using the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) baseline (2013-2018) and 2-year follow-up data (2015-2020), we evaluate the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity coded 2 ways: the 6 mutually exclusive MBISG categories and individual endorsements of each racial-and-ethnic group. We compare the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity (HOS) to the accuracy of MBISG (using 2021 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data).
Results:
Concordance (C-statistic) of HOS baseline and follow-up self-reported race-and-ethnicity was 0.95-0.97 for AA&NHPI, Black, Hispanic, and White, 0.83 for AI/AN, and 0.72 for Multiracial using mutually exclusive categories (weighted concordance=0.956). Concordance of MBISG with self-report followed a similar pattern and had similar values, with somewhat lower AI/AN and Multiracial values. The concordance of individual endorsements over time was somewhat higher than for classification (weighted concordance=0.975).
Conclusions:
The concordance of MBISG with self-reported race-and-ethnicity appears to be limited by the consistency of self-report for some racial-and-ethnic groups when employing the 6-mutually-exclusive category approach. The use of individual endorsements can improve the consistency of self-reported data. Reconfiguring algorithms such as MBISG in this form could improve its overall performance.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Longitudinal Research
Regression Toward the Mean
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification