Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
Published on: August 3, 2016
Systematic evaluation of sampling rate influences and variability in POCIS using meta-analysis and quantitative
Peiyu Jiang1, Yiping Xu2, Kaifeng Rao2
1Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
None:
Despite the significant benefits of aquatic passive sampling (low detection limits and time-weighted average concentrations), the use of passive samplers is impeded by uncertainties, particularly concerning the accuracy of sampling rates. This study employed a systematic evaluation approach based on the combination of meta-analysis and quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) models to address these issues. A comprehensive meta-analysis based on extensive data from 298 studies on the Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Sampler (POCIS) identified essential configuration parameters, including the receiving phase (type, mass) and the diffusion-limiting membrane (type, thickness, pore size), as key factors influencing uptake kinetic parameters. The incomplete availability of these details across studies potentially impacts data reproducibility and comparability. The subsequent meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to reveal the most significant factors contributing to sampling rate variability and inter-study heterogeneity. The flow rate and octanol-water partitioning (Kow or pH-dependent Dow) were identified from all environmental factors and chemical properties. Furthermore, the impact of chemical properties on the sampling rates of POCIS was predicted by Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) models using 2D descriptors and random forest regression. The analysis highlighted that the electrotopological state and molecular mass are the most important chemical properties influencing the sampling rate. This study systematically unraveled the most important impact factors on reliable estimates of passive sampling rates, and these causes of uncertainty should be further considered in aquatic monitoring and assessment with passive samplers.
More Related Videos
08:31Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
Published on: December 1, 2020
08:43PTR-ToF-MS Coupled with an Automated Sampling System and Tailored Data Analysis for Food Studies: Bioprocess Monitoring, Screening and Nose-space Analysis
Published on: May 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Introduction to Statistical Process Control
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Convenience Sampling Method
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...