Long-term outcome for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer and the prognostic impact of nodal therapy response: A population-based study
- 1Karolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 2Karolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Oncology, Capio Sankt Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 3Karolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 0Karolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
|
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for non-metastatic breast cancer showed no survival benefit over adjuvant treatment. Patients achieving a negative nodal stage after neoadjuvant therapy (cN+/pN0) have an excellent prognosis, suggesting potential for treatment de-escalation.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Breast Cancer Research
- Clinical Trial Analysis
Background
- Neoadjuvant systemic treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer is increasingly used, but its impact on overall survival compared to adjuvant therapy remains debated.
- The management of axillary lymph nodes in patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment is an evolving area of clinical practice.
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the overall survival of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who received neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic therapy.
- To investigate the prognostic significance of clinical to pathologic nodal stage conversion (cN/pN) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected population-based registry from the Stockholm-Gotland region (2007-2020).
- Inclusion of 2126 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 4754 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Comparison of overall survival using inverse probability treatment weighting and landmark analysis, with investigation of cN/pN stage changes.
Main Results
- No significant difference in overall survival was observed between neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment groups (HR=1.38, p=0.062).
- Patients who converted from positive clinical to negative pathologic nodal stage (cN+/pN0) demonstrated improved outcomes compared to cN0/pN0 or pN0 after primary surgery.
- The cN+/pN0 group exhibited a distinct disease trajectory with an early peak in mortality risk followed by a rapid and sustained decline.
Conclusions
- Neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapies yield similar survival outcomes for non-metastatic breast cancer.
- Patients with cN+/pN0 status after neoadjuvant treatment have a favorable prognosis, indicating potential for de-escalation of both local and systemic treatments.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
01:21
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
02:57
The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

