Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
The association between neighborhood social vulnerability and community-based rehabilitation after stroke
Shuqi Zhang1, Elizabeth R Mormer2, Anna M Johnson1
1Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Background:
Timely rehabilitative care is vital for functional recovery after stroke. Social determinants may influence access to and use of post-stroke care but have been inadequately explored. The study examined the relationship between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and community-based rehabilitation utilization.
Methods:
We included 6,843 adults (51.6% female; 75.1% White; mean age 70.1) discharged home after a stroke enrolled in the COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services study, a pragmatic trial conducted in 40 North Carolina hospitals from 2016-2019. Rehabilitation utilization was sourced from administrative claims. Geocoded addresses were linked to 2018 Census tract SVI. Associations between SVI and 90-day rehabilitation use, adjusted for patient's clinical and socio-economic characteristics, were obtained from generalized estimating equations. We also examined the associations of SVI with therapy setting, types of therapy, intensity of visits, and time to first visit.
Results:
Thirty-five percent of patients had at least one physical (PT) or occupational therapy (OT) visit within 90 days, ranging from 32.4%-38.7% across SVI quintiles. In adjusted analysis, there was no dose-reponse relationship between higher summary SVI, nor most of its sub-domains, and 90-day rehabilitation use. Greater vulnerability in household composition and disability was modestly associated with -0.4% (95% CI -4.1% to 3.4%) to -4.3% (95% CI -0.8% to -7.7%) lower rehabilitation use across SVI quartiles. Greater summary and subdomain SVI was associated with higher odds of receiving therapy in the home versus outpatient clinic (OR = 1.88, 1.58 to 2.17 for Q5 vs Q1 summary SVI) and receiving both PT and OT versus a single-type therapy (1.72, 1.48 to 1.97 for Q5 vs. Q1 summary SVI). No differences were observed for therapy intensity or time to therapy.
Conclusion:
Use of rehabilitation care was low, and largely similar across levels of SVI and most of its subdomains. Individuals residing in areas of high SVI were more likely to receive therapy in the home and to receive dual therapy, possibly reflecting greater need among these individuals. Future studies should evaluate potential mechanisms for these findings and further identify both patient and community factors that may inform strategies to improve rehabilitation use.
Clinical Trial Number:
https://www.
Clinicaltrials:
gov/ NCT02588664 [registration date: 2015-10-23].
More Related Videos
05:52Mobile Game-based Virtual Reality Program for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation
Published on: March 8, 2018
04:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
Published on: September 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Restorative Care