Direction selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex to moving light bars. I. Relation to stationary flashing...

Quantitative estimates of the direction selectivities of 118 simple cells in response to moving light bars were expressed as a percentage calculated from the ratio of the response peaks: (preferred minus nonpreferred)/preferred. Virtually all simple cells were direction selective to some degree (mean direction selectivity 73.6%). Static-field plots to a stationary flashing bar were prepared from 74 of the 118 cells. Particular attention was given to the 42 cells with only two subregions in their static-field plot, one subregion responding at light on and the other at light off. It was concluded that interactive effects between subregions, whether synergistic or antagonistic, have little if any influence on the direction selective mechanism when the stimulus is a narrow light bar. Eighty two of the 118 cells were also tested with moving light and dark edges and of these 53 had response profiles with only two response peaks, one to the light edge and the other to the dark edge. Forty one of the 53 cells were each not only direction selective for both a light edge and a dark edge but also had a preferred direction for both edges that was the same as that for a light bar. Only two cells had preferred directions for both light and dark edges that were opposite to the direction preferred by the light bar. With one possible exception, every cell with two response static-field plot showed a one-to-one correspondence between the ordinal sequence of the response peaks and the ordinal sequence of the subregions. Depending upon the polarity of the moving edge and the ordinal sequence of the subregions, the mean level of the direction selectivity to a moving edge was significantly below that to a narrow moving light bar. This reduction in the degree of the direction selectivity appears to be due to an interaction between the subregions leading to a reduction in the amplitude of the response in the preferred direction rather than a suppression of the direction selective mechanism that operates in the nonpreferred direction. Moving edges cause a weak interactive effect between the subregions that seems always to reduce the degree of the direction selectivity, never increasing it.