Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Antegrade Ureteral Stenting in Pediatric Patients: Introducing a Novel Ureteral Morphological Classification and a
Mustafa Mazıcan1, Ismail Karluka1, Abdulkerim Temiz2
1Interventional Radiology Department, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Application and Research Center, Başkent University, 01250 Adana, Turkey.
Insights
Antegrade ureteral stenting is a safe and effective procedure for pediatric patients, achieving high technical success rates. A new ureteral morphology classification may aid clinical guidance.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Interventional Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Antegrade ureteral stenting is an alternative for pediatric patients unsuitable for retrograde stent placement.
- Assessing benefits of antegrade stenting and imaging is crucial.
- A novel classification for ureteral morphology is proposed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antegrade ureteral stenting in children.
- To introduce a new classification system based on ureteral morphology.
- To correlate ureteral morphology with functional success rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 107 antegrade stent placements in 71 pediatric patients (0-12 years).
- Ureters classified into four morphologic categories: normal, straight/slightly angled, S-shaped, and spiral-shaped.
- Functional success assessed using ultrasonography and Tc-99m MAG3 scintigraphy pre- and post-procedure.
Main Results:
- High technical success rate (99.1%) and functional success rate (84.1%).
- Intra-procedural (5.6%) and post-procedural (39.3%) complication rates were documented.
- Lowest functional success in spiral-shaped ureters (79.5%), though not statistically significant (p=0.775).
Conclusions:
- Antegrade ureteral stenting is a safe procedure in pediatric patients with high technical success.
- The proposed ureteral morphologic classification may assist in clinical decision-making.
- Complication rates were acceptable for this patient group.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: The objective of the current research is to assess the benefits that come with antegrade ureteral stenting coupled with imaging techniques in children and also provide a new classification based on the ureter's morphological elements. Methods: Between 2011 and 2024, 107 antegrade stent placement procedures performed in 71 pediatric patients aged 0-12 years who could not undergo retrograde double-J stent placement were retrospectively analyzed. According to the morphologic structure of the ureter, four categories were classified as normal, straight/slightly angled, S-shaped, and spiral-shaped. Functional success was evaluated by comparing the results of ultrasonography and Tc-99m MAG3 scintigraphy before and after the procedure. Results: Technical success rate was 99.1% and functional success rate was 84.1%. Intra-procedural complication rate was 5.6% and post-procedural complication rate was 39.3%. According to morphologic classification, the functional success rate was lowest in spiral-shaped ureters with 79.5%, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.775). There was no significant correlation between stent diameter, balloon dilatation, and degree of hydronephrosis and functional success. Conclusions: Antegrade ureteral stent placement is a safe method with high technical success and acceptable complication rates in pediatric patients. The developed ureteral morphologic classification may guide clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Ureters
Kidney Structure

