Variations in Revascularization Strategies for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Nationwide Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Assessing Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 8, 2019
Aishwarya Raja1, Yang Song2, Siling Li2
1Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
This study reveals significant hospital variations in treating chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Endovascular treatment at high-volume centers improved limb salvage rates, suggesting a need for standardized CLTI revascularization strategies.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Contemporary data support both surgical and endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).
- However, hospital-based practice patterns and their outcomes remain incompletely understood.
- This study addresses this gap by examining variations in CLTI treatment strategies across U.S. hospitals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize contemporary variations in surgical-first versus endovascular-first revascularization approaches for CLTI.
- To evaluate the outcomes associated with these different strategies across U.S. hospitals.
- To identify potential factors influencing treatment decisions and patient outcomes in CLTI management.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of Medicare beneficiaries (≥66 years) with CLTI treated between October 2015 and December 2021.
- Inclusion of patients from institutions offering both surgical and endovascular revascularization options.
- Utilized marginal Cox regression, adjusting for patient-level covariates to compare outcomes.
Main Results:
- 82.5% of 196,070 patients underwent endovascular treatment, with significant interhospital variability (median OR 2.32).
- Endovascular treatment at high-quintile hospitals correlated with lower major amputation rates (aHR 0.82) but higher repeat procedures (aHR 1.37).
- Surgical bypass at high-quintile hospitals showed higher amputation rates (aHR 1.21) and fewer repeat procedures (aHR 0.73).
Conclusions:
- Significant interhospital variability exists in CLTI revascularization strategies.
- Endovascular treatment at higher-volume centers is associated with improved limb salvage outcomes.
- Standardization of CLTI treatment protocols is crucial for enhancing limb salvage rates.
Background:
Recent data support both surgical-first and endovascular-first revascularization approaches for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), but hospital-based practices are poorly described.
Objectives:
This aim of this study was to characterize contemporary variations and outcomes associated with each strategy among U.S. hospitals providing both approaches.
Methods:
Medicare beneficiaries ≥66 years of age with CLTI treated at institutions offering both strategies between October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021 were analyzed. A marginal Cox regression approach was used, and models were adjusted for patient-level covariates.
Results:
Among 196,070 patients at 1,832 institutions, 82.5% underwent endovascular treatment. Patients undergoing endovascular revascularization were older and had a higher comorbidity burden. The adjusted median OR for receiving an endovascular procedure was 2.32 among hospitals (Q1-Q3: 2.24-2.40; P < 0.01), demonstrating high variability in intervention use. Patients undergoing endovascular revascularization at the highest quintile hospitals had a lower rate of major amputation (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.77-0.88; P < 0.01) and a higher rate of repeat procedures (aHR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.32-1.43; P < 0.01). Patients undergoing surgical bypass at the highest quintile hospitals had a higher rate of major amputation (aHR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.13-1.29; P < 0.01) and a lower rate of repeat procedures (aHR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76; P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
This study showed large interhospital variability in revascularization strategies, as well as improved outcomes for patients receiving endovascular treatment at higher volume sites. Further work is needed to standardize treatments with the goal of improving limb salvage rates.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
08:16High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Footpad Vasculature in a Murine Hindlimb Gangrene Model
Published on: March 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care