Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment:
Steve Goodacre1,2, Laura Sutton3, Gordon Fuller3,2
1Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK s.goodacre@sheffield.ac.uk.
Background:
Initial ED assessment can use early warning scores to identify and prioritise patients who need time-critical treatment. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) for predicting the need for time-critical treatment.
Methods:
We undertook a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study. We randomly selected 4000 adults who attended a tertiary hospital ED in England from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 and had NEWS2 routinely recorded on electronic patient records. The first NEWS2 and vital signs were extracted from electronic records. Research nurses selected cases that received a potentially time-critical treatment. Two independent clinical experts then determined whether time-critical treatment was or should have been received using an expert consensus derived list of interventions. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity at predefined thresholds to evaluate the accuracy of NEWS2 for predicting need for time-critical intervention and, as a secondary outcome, mortality at 7 days.
Results:
After excluding 10 patients who received their intervention before NEWS2 recording, 164/3990 (4.1%) needed time-critical treatment and 71/3990 (1.8%) died within 7 days. NEWS2 predicted need for time-critical treatment with a c-statistic of 0.807 (95% CI 0.765 to 0.849) and death within 7 days with a c-statistic of 0.865 (95% CI 0.813, 0.917). NEWS2>4 predicted need for time-critical treatment with sensitivity of 51.8% (95% CI 44.2%, 59.3%) and positive predictive value of 25.8% (95% CI 21.3%, 30.7%). 37 of the 45 patients needing emergency surgery, antibiotics for open fractures, insulin infusion or manipulation of limb-threatening injuries had NEWS2≤4. Patients with NEWS2>4 who did not need time-critical treatment frequently scored maximum points on NEWS2 for their respiratory rate, conscious level or receiving supplemental oxygen.
Conclusion:
NEWS2 has limited accuracy for predicting need for time-critical treatment. We have identified time-critical interventions that frequently have low NEWS2 scores and NEWS2 parameters than may overestimate need for time-critical intervention.
Trial Registration Number:
Research Registry 10450.
