Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With...

This analysis explored real-world characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) previously treated with lenalidomide and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and requiring subsequent treatment.

The PREAMBLE and Connect MM prospective registries of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and the US nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database were analysed. MM-specific treatment patterns (prior/index therapies) and outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS]/overall survival [OS]) were assessed.

This analysis included: PREAMBLE n = 215; Connect MM n = 232; Flatiron Health n = 845. Median age at index was 69.0 years, median 3 prior lines of therapy; > 50% male. The most common index regimens accounted < 15% of treatments (most common PREAMBLE, Connect MM: carfilzomib±dexamethasone; Flatiron Health: pomalidomide+daratumumab+dexamethasone); most patients received classes that they had previously; ≥ 93% were triple-class exposed (immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, anti-CD38 mAb). In PREAMBLE, Connect MM and Flatiron Health, respectively: 80.9%, 68.1% and 77.2% were lenalidomide- and anti-CD38 mAb-refractory; 69.3%, 67.2% and 71.1% were triple-class refractory (TCR); median PFS: 5.2 (95% CI 3.7-6.7), 4.4 (3.5-5.6) and 5.3 months (4.8-6.0); median OS: 19.3 (15.8-26.1), 14.2 (11.0-16.9) and 23.1 months (19.0-28.6). PFS and OS were shorter in lenalidomide- and anti-CD38 mAb-refractory patients versus those who were not refractory to both. A similar pattern was observed for TCR patients versus non-TCR patients.

There is no uniform standard of care for patients with RRMM with prior exposure to lenalidomide and anti-CD38 mAbs. Survival outcomes are poor, with a need for effective treatments for these patients.