Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Published on: February 19, 2022
Quality of gastrointestinal surgical oncology care according to insurance status
Samuel D Butensky1, Daniel Kerekes1, Baylee F Bakkila2
1Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Background:
Despite efforts to expand insurance coverage, substantial inequalities persist, particularly in cancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate whether quality disparities exist across major insurance plans for patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study of adult patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with GI malignant neoplasms between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. The primary tumor organ sites include the anus, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, liver, other biliary organ, pancreas, peritoneum, rectum, rectosigmoid, small intestine, and stomach. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of insurance status on resection margin, adequacy of lymphadenectomy, and receipt of lymphadenectomy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis.
Results:
Of the 1,084,555 patients in this study, 594,013 (54.8%) had Medicare insurance, 380,287 (35.1%) had private insurance, 57,402 (5.3%) had Medicaid insurance, and 29,133 (2.7%) were uninsured. Privately insured patients were more likely to have negative margins (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06) than Medicare-insured patients. Uninsured patients were the least likely to have negative margins (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75-0.81) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99) than Medicare-insured patients. Non-Medicare-insured patients were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, whereas Medicare-insured patients had higher omission rates because of comorbidities. Finally, multivariate survival analysis showed that Medicare-insured patients had a 14% increased risk of death compared with non-Medicare-insured patients.
Conclusion:
Significant disparities in the quality of surgical oncology care exist based on insurance status. Healthcare policy interventions may be necessary to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical GI cancer care in the United States.
More Related Videos
10:31Intraoperative Gastroscopy for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Published on: August 9, 2016
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: