Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Spine Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and
Wongthawat Liawrungrueang1, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak2, Arunee Promsri3
1Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Abstract:
Study DesignSystematic review.ObjectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models have recently emerged as tools to improve fracture detection, mainly through imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and radiographs. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance of AI and DL models in detecting cervical spine fractures and assesses their potential role in clinical practice.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and July 2024. Studies that evaluated AI models for cervical spine fracture detection were included. Diagnostic performance metrics were extracted and included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve. The PROBAST tool assessed bias, and PRISMA criteria were used for study selection and reporting.ResultsEleven studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included in the review. AI models demonstrated variable performance, with sensitivity ranging from 54.9% to 100% and specificity from 72% to 98.6%. Models applied to CT imaging generally outperformed those applied to radiographs, with convolutional neural networks (CNN) and advanced architectures such as MobileNetV2 and Vision Transformer (ViT) achieving the highest accuracy. However, most studies lacked external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability of their findings.ConclusionsAI and DL models show significant potential in improving fracture detection, particularly in CT imaging. While these models offer high diagnostic accuracy, further validation and refinement are necessary before they can be widely integrated into clinical practice. AI should complement, rather than replace, human expertise in diagnostic workflows.

