Effects of population-based screening for atrial fibrillation on quality of life

Emilie Katrine Kongebro1, Christian Kronborg2, Lucas Yixi Xing1

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Insights

Screening for atrial fibrillation in high-risk individuals did not improve quality of life over three years. Continuous screening did not show significant differences in health outcomes compared to usual care.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Public Health
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly common.
  • The impact of AF screening on patient quality of life (QoL) is not fully understood.
  • High-risk individuals may experience varied QoL outcomes following AF screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of continuous atrial fibrillation screening on quality of life in high-risk individuals.
  • To compare QoL outcomes between patients randomized to usual care versus those receiving screening with an implantable loop recorder.
  • To assess changes in EQ-5D-5L index scores and EQ VAS over a three-year period.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 6,004 participants with stroke risk factors.
  • Participants were assigned to either usual care (n=4,503) or implantable loop recorder screening (n=1,501).
  • Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D-5L instrument, analyzing index scores and visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) at baseline and three years.

Main Results:

  • After three years, 95% of participants were alive, and 86% had complete QoL data.
  • Both groups experienced a decrease in EQ-5D-5L index scores and EQ VAS, with no statistically significant difference between the screening and control groups (p=0.063 and p=0.056).
  • Major problems, particularly pain/discomfort, were reported, with no significant difference in the occurrence of any major problem between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Population-based, continuous screening for atrial fibrillation in high-risk individuals did not lead to improved quality of life.
  • The study found no significant difference in QoL outcomes between AF screening and usual care.
  • Long-term continuous screening for AF in high-risk populations may not enhance patient-reported quality of life.
Abstract