Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
How to Put Survival After Cardiothoracic Interventions in the General Population Context: A Case-Based Practical
Xu Wang1, Maximiliaan L Notenboom1, Kevin M Veen1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (X.W., M.L.N., K.M.V., P.G., J.R.G.E., A.J.J.C.B., J.J.M.T.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Comparing patient survival after cardiothoracic surgery to general population survival requires careful matching. This study shows that the method of matching significantly impacts survival estimates, particularly for older patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- Patient survival after cardiothoracic interventions needs context from general population survival.
- Accurate comparison requires methodologies for matching general population mortality to patient cohorts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline and evaluate methodologies for matching general population mortality to patient survival data.
- To calculate cumulative matched-general-population survival and assess its variability based on matching strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a multicenter dataset of Ross procedure survivors.
- Extracted general population mortality from Human Mortality Database life tables.
- Applied various matching strategies considering age, calendar year, country, and sex.
Main Results:
- Included 1431 hospital survivors from 5 countries.
- Fifteen-year survival was 88.3%; cumulative matched-general-population survival varied from 87.7% to 89.8%.
- Estimates varied significantly for older patients (67.4%-59.8%) versus younger patients (96.9%-96.7%) based on matching complexity.
Conclusions:
- Methodologies for matching general population mortality to patient survival yield variable estimates.
- Comprehensive matching considering country, sex, individual age, and calendar year is recommended.
- A web-based Shiny Application is available for calculating cumulative matched-general-population survival.
Background:
Observed patient survival after cardiothoracic interventions should ideally be placed in the context of matched-general-population survival. This study outlines several methodologies of matching general population mortality to the study sample, subsequently calculating cumulative matched-general-population survival, highlighting their respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations.
Methods:
A multicenter data set containing survival data after the Ross procedure was used for methodological illustration. General population mortality was extracted from country-specific life tables in the Human Mortality Database. The matched-general-population mortality, also known as background mortality, was obtained by matching general population mortality to the study sample using different matching strategies, iteratively considering median/individual age and median/individual calendar year, besides country and sex. The corresponding cumulative matched-general-population survival was calculated subsequently. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of varying patient ages on survival estimates by adding and subtracting 15 years from individual patients. A web-based Shiny Application (App) was developed to easily calculate cumulative matched-general-population survival.
Results:
In total, 1431 hospital survivors from the Ross procedure from 5 countries (25.7% female; median age, 48.5 [interquartile range, 42.7-54.0] years) were included. Fifteen-year survival was 88.3% (95% CI, 85.3-90.6). Cumulative matched-general-population 15-year survival varied from 87.7% to 89.8% using the 3 methods of different complexities. For 15-year-older patients, the cumulative matched-general-population 15-year survival was 67.4%, 59.8%, and 63.2%, respectively, using the simplest to the most comprehensive matching methods; for 15-year-younger patients, it was 96.9%, 96.1%, and 96.7%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Different methodologies to match general population mortality to observed patient mortality yield variable estimates of cumulative matched-general-population survival, especially in older patients. The cumulative matched-general-population survival should ideally be calculated by considering country, sex, individual patient age, and calendar year (both updated annually). This method can be easily implemented using the web-based Shiny App enclosed in this article.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach

