Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025
Multidimensional Coculture System to Model Lung Squamous Carcinoma Progression
Published on: March 17, 2020
Census Tract Rurality, Predominant Race and Ethnicity, and Distance to Lung Cancer Screening Facilities : An
Solmaz Amiri1, Candice L Wilshire2, Clemma Jacobsen Muller1
1Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, Washington (S.A., C.J.M., C.A., G.F.).
Background:
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual lung cancer screening (LCS) for adults who meet specific age and smoking history criteria.
Objective:
To evaluate race-, ethnicity-, and rurality-based differences in distance to the nearest LCS facility.
Design:
Cross-sectional ecological study.
Setting:
U.S. census tracts.
Participants:
71 691 census tracts.
Measurements:
The outcome variable was road network distance in miles between a census tract and the nearest LCS facility. Distance was log-transformed, and geometric means are reported. Census tracts were classified as majority (>50%) American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), Asian, Black, non-Hispanic White (NHW), no single race, or Hispanic. Rurality was defined using the rural-urban commuting area codes. Ordinary least-squares regression examined the associations between distance and census tract race, ethnicity, and rurality.
Results:
Geometric mean distance to the nearest LCS facility was 6.5 miles. Compared with NHW-majority census tracts, distance to the nearest LCS facility was 5.26 times (426%) longer in AI/AN-majority census tracts and 7% to 39% shorter in Asian-, Black-, and Hispanic-majority census tracts. Adjustment for rurality reduced the mean distance in AI/AN-majority census tracts, but the mean distance was still 3.16 times the distance in NHW-majority census tracts. Adjustment for rurality reduced the observed advantage in Asian- and Black-majority census tracts and changed the direction of associations in Hispanic-majority census tracts.
Limitation:
Analyses did not account for travel time or cost.
Conclusion:
Differences exist in distance to LCS facilities by race and ethnicity that can only be partially explained by rurality.
Primary Funding Source:
Lung Ambition Alliance and the Center for Lung Research in Honor of Wayne Gittinger.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
01:11Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
01:47Lung Capacity
01:30Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
01:28Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and...
01:09Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...