Protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of the Telehealth for Early Developmental

Abbey L Eeles1,2,3, Alicia J Spittle4,2,3, Stacey Dusing5

  • 1Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia abbey.eeles@unimelb.edu.au.

BMJ Open
|January 14, 2025
PubMed

Insights

This study evaluates the TEDI-Prem telehealth intervention for very preterm infants, aiming to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes and parental well-being. Results will inform early intervention strategies for this vulnerable population.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Digital Health Interventions

Background:

  • Infants born very preterm (<32 weeks' gestation) face heightened risks of neurodevelopmental impairments and behavioral delays.
  • Parents of very preterm infants often experience poorer mental health outcomes compared to parents of full-term infants.
  • Existing research highlights the need for effective early developmental interventions for very preterm infants and their families.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the efficacy of the TEDI-Prem (Telehealth for Early Developmental Intervention in babies born very preterm) program.
  • To assess the impact of TEDI-Prem on neurodevelopmental outcomes and parental well-being in very preterm infants.
  • To compare TEDI-Prem plus usual care against usual care alone in a randomized controlled trial.

Main Methods:

  • A multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving 466 very preterm infants across five Australian hospitals.
  • Participants randomized to either TEDI-Prem plus usual care or usual care alone.
  • TEDI-Prem intervention includes 13 sessions (face-to-face and telehealth) until 12 months corrected age, focusing on motor, cognitive, and language development, parent-child interaction, and parental mental health.

Main Results:

  • Primary outcome: Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-fourth edition (Bayley-4) Motor Composite Score at 12 months corrected age.
  • Secondary outcomes include cognitive and language scores, social-emotional assessment, parental mental health, parent-child interaction, and quality of life measures at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
  • Statistical analysis using linear and logistic regression via generalized estimating equations to account for multiple births and site effects.

Conclusions:

  • The TEDI-Prem intervention is hypothesized to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes and parental well-being in very preterm infants.
  • Findings will provide evidence on the effectiveness of telehealth-based early developmental interventions for this high-risk population.
  • Results will inform clinical practice and policy regarding early intervention services for infants born very preterm.
Abstract