Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Risk perception among healthcare professionals working in emergency care in remote locations: a scoping review
Célia Maria Queirós1,2, Teresa Martins3,4, Tiago Correia5,2
1Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Associate Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health, LA-REAL, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal cqueiros38@gmail.com.
Introduction:
Providing healthcare in emergency services is a multifaceted challenge that demands prompt approaches. Ensuring safety and efficacy becomes even more challenging in 'remote locations', referring to geographical areas located far from urban centres or densely populated regions, often characterised by insufficient access to services, infrastructure and communication channels. Despite the pivotal role of healthcare professionals' skills and knowledge in risk management in these contexts, academic literature has largely overlooked this aspect. Thus, addressing healthcare professionals' perceptions of risks within remote areas is crucial for informed decision-making and improved service administration.
Methods And Analysis:
This scoping review protocol adopts the methodology outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The objective is to delineate the current scientific evidence regarding the perception of both direct and indirect risks associated with healthcare practice in remote emergency settings. Employing the Population, Concept, and Context dimensions, inclusion criteria were established for each dimension: Population-nurses or other healthcare professionals with overlapping roles; Concept-perception of risk; Context-remote community or site and emergency care. The search will encompass the Scopus, PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane, CINAHL and Web of Science databases. A specific time frame for the selection of articles was not delimited. Observational, quantitative, qualitative studies and reviews will be eligible for inclusion if they meet the predetermined criteria. Two reviewers will undertake the document review process. Eligible documents may be in English or Portuguese, and only those subjected to peer review will be considered for inclusion.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethical approval will not be necessary for this study as it entails a scoping review based on previously published evidence. The findings from the scoping review will be disseminated through scientific conferences and published in academic journals.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Obedience
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
The Availability Heuristic
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

