Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

  1. Home
  3. Research Domains
  5. Information And Computing Sciences
  7. Artificial Intelligence
  9. Intelligent Robotics
  11. Implant Position Accuracy Using Dynamic Computer-assisted Implant Surgery (cais) Combined With Augmented Reality: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Sirida Arunjaroensuk1,2, Thanida Yotpibulwong2, Po-Sung Fu3,4

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Journal of Dental Sciences
|January 14, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
05:42

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement

Published on: September 13, 2022

3.6K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

1.7K
Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

2.1K

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Augmented reality (AR) glasses did not significantly improve the accuracy of dental implant placement when used with dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS). This study found similar precision for implant positioning with or without AR technology.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Surgical Navigation Technology
  • Augmented Reality Applications

Background:

  • Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) enhances precision in dental implant placement.
  • Dynamic CAIS systems offer real-time visualization of surgical instruments and patient positioning.
  • Augmented reality (AR) technology presents potential for overlaying digital information in surgical fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of dental implant positioning using dynamic CAIS with and without AR glasses.
  • To evaluate the clinical efficacy of AR glasses in augmenting dynamic CAIS for implant surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized clinical study involving 20 patients requiring single dental implants.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: dynamic CAIS with AR glasses (n=10) and dynamic CAIS without AR glasses (n=10).
Keywords:
AccuracyAugmented reality (AR)Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS)Dynamic system

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
05:42

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement

Published on: September 13, 2022

3.6K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

1.7K
Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

2.1K
  • Three-dimensional deviations (platform, apex, angular) were measured and statistically analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • The AR glasses group showed mean 3D angular deviations of 1.47° ± 1.01°, compared to 2.42° ± 0.76° in the non-AR group.
    • Mean 3D entry point deviations were 0.75 ± 0.45 mm (AR) vs. 1.11 ± 0.44 mm (non-AR).
    • Mean 3D apical deviations were 0.87 ± 0.45 mm (AR) vs. 1.18 ± 0.50 mm (non-AR), with no statistically significant differences between groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic CAIS with AR glasses demonstrated similar accuracy in single dental implant placement compared to dynamic CAIS alone.
    • The integration of AR glasses did not yield a statistically significant improvement in implant position accuracy in this study.
    • Further research may explore specific scenarios or advanced AR features for potential benefits in CAIS.
    Navigation