Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hedlund paranoia.

J C George

    Journal of Clinical Psychology
    |March 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Tarasoff duty requires mental health professionals to warn potential victims. However, the Hedlund decision has been widely misinterpreted, leading to confusion among psychologists regarding their legal obligations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Molecular insights into the historic demography of bowhead whales: understanding the evolutionary basis of contemporary management practices.

    Ecology and evolution·2013
    Same author

    Lyme borreliosis incidence in two French departments: correlation with infection of Ixodes ricinus ticks by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato.

    Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)·2007
    Same author

    Cost-effectiveness of coarctation repair strategies: endovascular stenting versus surgery.

    Pediatric cardiology·2003
    Same author

    [Tick-borne diseases and ecosystem modifications in Lorraine].

    Bulletin de la Societe de pathologie exotique (1990)·2003
    Same author

    [Tick-borne diseases and changes in the ecosystem in Lorraine].

    Bulletin de la Societe de pathologie exotique (1990)·2002
    Same author

    The role of Eskimo hunters, veterinarians, and other biologists in improving the humane aspects of the subsistence harvest of bowhead whales.

    Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·1999
    Same journal

    Profiles of Early Life Stress and Their Interaction With Proximal Stress in Early Adulthood: A Person-Centered Approach.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Single Versus Multiple Intimate Partner Violence Relationships: Current Severity of Psychological Distress Among Romantic Partners.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Psychological Distress Profiles in Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss During Subsequent Early Pregnancy and Their Association With Sleep Characteristics: A Latent Profile Analysis.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Personality Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Cluster Analysis Based on the Millon Test Scores.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Exploring Reasoning Biases Associated With Psychosis in Borderline Personality Disorder Using Self-Report and Objective Measures.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Maladaptive Perfectionism and Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Longitudinal Moderated Mediation Model of Hopelessness and Self-Concept Clarity.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Law
    • Ethics

    Background:

    • The Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California (1976) case established a mental health professional's duty to warn.
    • Subsequent legal interpretations have shaped the scope and application of this duty.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the landmark Tarasoff decision and its implications.
    • To analyze the Hedlund v. Superior Court (1983) case in relation to Tarasoff and California tort law.
    • To address the misinterpretation of the Hedlund decision among psychologists.

    Main Methods:

    • Legal case review
    • Analysis of tort law principles
    • Examination of judicial precedent

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • The Tarasoff decision created a significant duty for mental health professionals.
    • The Hedlund decision, while building on Tarasoff, has been subject to widespread misreading.
    • Many psychologists are misinformed about their legal responsibilities following Hedlund.

    Conclusions:

    • The interpretation of Hedlund v. Superior Court requires clarification.
    • Accurate understanding of these legal precedents is crucial for ethical and legal practice in psychology.
    • Misinformation regarding therapist duty-to-warn laws can have serious consequences.