Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized

Mohammad Daher1,2,3, Marven Aoun1, Ethan J Cottrill3

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

Spine
|January 14, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for thoracolumbar fractures shows reduced complications like blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to open surgery. However, MIS involves higher radiation exposure, with both methods being safe and effective.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Spine Surgery
  • Trauma Surgery

Background:

  • Debate exists on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.
  • Existing studies have limitations due to small sample sizes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MIS and open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures.
  • To provide a comprehensive assessment of outcomes for both surgical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases.
  • Extracted data on complications, surgical parameters, pain, and kyphosis.

Main Results:

  • Included 10 studies (5 RCTs, 5 prospective) with 584 patients.
  • MIS group showed significantly less estimated blood loss (EBL), shorter length of stay (LOS), lower early postoperative pain, and less regional kyphosis.
  • MIS group had longer fluoroscopy time, but this was not significant in RCTs alone.

Conclusions:

  • MIS for thoracolumbar fractures is associated with decreased EBL, shorter LOS, earlier pain reduction, and less regional kyphosis compared to open fixation.
  • Higher radiation exposure was noted with MIS.
  • Both MIS and open fixation are safe and reliable treatment options.

Related Concept Videos