Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.

D M Green, C R Mason

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
    |March 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The birthday problem: repeated sampling of animal populations and ethics of experimental design.

    Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
    Same author

    In vitro human skin absorption of linalool: Effects of vehicle composition, evaporation and occlusion on permeation and distribution.

    International journal of pharmaceutics·2022
    Same author

    The contact structure of Great Britain's salmon and trout aquaculture industry.

    Epidemics·2019
    Same author

    Identifying genotype specific elevated-risk areas and associated herd risk factors for bovine tuberculosis spread in British cattle.

    Epidemics·2018
    Same author

    Heterogeneous responses of temperate-zone amphibian populations to climate change complicates conservation planning.

    Scientific reports·2017
    Same author

    Male infertility in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

    Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2014

    Auditory profile analysis reveals that signal detection is easier in mid-frequency ranges. Experienced listeners perform better with multi-component sounds, while inexperienced listeners excel with single components.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychoacoustics
    • Auditory perception
    • Signal detection theory

    Background:

    • Auditory profile analysis involves detecting changes within complex sound environments.
    • Understanding how sound characteristics influence detection is crucial for auditory research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of frequency, position, and phase on auditory signal detection.
    • To compare traditional Weber fraction experiments with multi-component auditory profile experiments.
    • To examine the role of listener experience in auditory profile analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Three experiments were conducted, manipulating signal frequency, position, and relative phase in multitonal complexes.
    • Detection thresholds were measured for single-component and multi-component auditory stimuli.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Listener experience was a factor in the third experiment, comparing trained and untrained observers.

    • Main Results:

    • Signal detection was optimal for mid-frequency components (around 1000 Hz), irrespective of signal position.
    • Relative phase of components had minimal impact on detection performance.
    • Multi-component conditions showed improved detection thresholds compared to single-component conditions up to 70 dB SPL for experienced listeners.
    • Inexperienced listeners demonstrated better detection in single-component conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory profile analysis performance is influenced by frequency, with mid-range frequencies being most sensitive.
    • Listener experience significantly modulates the effectiveness of multi-component sound processing.
    • The findings contribute to understanding auditory perception and the complexities of sound analysis in different listening conditions.