Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

117
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
117
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

6.9K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
6.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

178
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
178
Exercise and Muscle Performance01:27

Exercise and Muscle Performance

1.3K
Exercise induces a range of adaptations in muscle tissue, depending on the type and duration of activity. Such physical training can be broadly categorized into two types: endurance exercises and resistance exercises.
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High- and Low-Load Resistance Training Produce Distinct Skeletal Muscle Growth but Similar Changes in Tendon Morphology.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2026
Same author

Contribution of Sport Type to the Association Between Handgrip Strength and Morbidity/Mortality: Future Follow-up Study and Possible Mechanisms.

Sports medicine - open·2026
Same author

Inter-individual variability in pain perception and sensitivity responses to low-load exercise with an absolute or relative blood flow restriction pressure.

Journal of sports sciences·2026
Same author

Rethinking task failure in resistance training research: a framework for submaximal exercise prescription.

European journal of applied physiology·2026
Same author

Associations Between Handgrip Strength and Markers of Insulin Resistance and Inflammation in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Translational sports medicine·2026
Same author

Non-Specific Strength Changes Between High- and Low-Load Isotonic Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models
08:31

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models

Published on: December 17, 2021

2.5K

Methodological Considerations When Studying Resistance-Trained Populations: Ideas for Using Control Groups.

William B Hammert1, Scott J Dankel2, Ryo Kataoka1

  • 1Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi; and.

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
|January 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Including control groups in resistance training studies is crucial for accurate measurement. This paper suggests using time-matched training or non-exercise control groups to improve research reliability.

More Related Videos

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
08:48

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: January 29, 2016

16.8K
Dosage-Adjusted Resistance Training in Mice with a Reduced Risk of Muscle Damage
07:29

Dosage-Adjusted Resistance Training in Mice with a Reduced Risk of Muscle Damage

Published on: August 31, 2022

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models
08:31

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models

Published on: December 17, 2021

2.5K
Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
08:48

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: January 29, 2016

16.8K
Dosage-Adjusted Resistance Training in Mice with a Reduced Risk of Muscle Damage
07:29

Dosage-Adjusted Resistance Training in Mice with a Reduced Risk of Muscle Damage

Published on: August 31, 2022

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Exercise Science
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Accurate quantification of training effects in resistance-trained populations is vital for experimental research applicability.
  • Studies on resistance-trained individuals often omit control groups, relying instead on short-term reliability measures.
  • This reliance on reliability measures may not fully account for measurement error over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the methodological limitations in studies involving resistance-trained populations.
  • To propose alternative strategies for incorporating control groups in resistance training research.
  • To enhance the validity and applicability of findings from resistance training studies.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the importance of time-matched non-exercise control groups.
  • Introduction of the "time-matched training group" concept for resistance-trained individuals.
  • Exploration of a "run-in" control period as an alternative strategy.

Main Results:

  • Control groups are rarely utilized in studies on resistance-trained individuals.
  • Short-term reliability measures are often used as a substitute for control groups.
  • Proposed methods include time-matched training groups, time-matched non-exercise control groups, or a run-in period.

Conclusions:

  • Employing appropriate control groups strengthens the design of research on resistance-trained individuals.
  • Time-matched training and non-exercise control groups offer robust alternatives.
  • A run-in period can serve as a viable control strategy when other designs are not feasible.