Evidence-based evaluation of student and marker performances in assessment and examination
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This study proposes a standardized framework using statistical methods to analyze student and marker performance in academic assessments. It ensures consistent, transparent evaluation, improving educational practices and accountability across institutions.
Area Of Science
- Educational Assessment
- Statistical Analysis in Education
Background
- Current assessment scrutiny lacks standardization across institutions and programs.
- Annual review of student and marker performance is crucial for evaluating learning and teaching efficiency.
Purpose Of The Study
- To propose a standardized framework for analyzing student and marker performance.
- To introduce quantitative and statistical methods for a unified and transparent assessment scrutiny.
- To enhance accountability and establish institutional standards in academic assessment.
Main Methods
- Utilizing rigorous statistical methods to compare student performance across courses.
- Analyzing marking accuracy, reliability, and consistency.
- Developing a framework with examples, recommendations, and suggested practices.
Main Results
- The proposed framework enables quantitative analysis of student and marker performance.
- It identifies strengths and weaknesses in assessment and examination practices.
- The method establishes a benchmark for performance comparison against a student's own norm.
Conclusions
- A standardized, statistically-driven framework improves the scrutiny of academic assessments.
- This approach enhances decision-making, tracks progress, and promotes accountability in educational institutions.
- Implementation can lead to improved educational practices and consistent assessment quality.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. To illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen...
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...