Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Using Continuous Data Tracking Technology to Study Exercise Adherence in Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published on: November 8, 2013
Factors Influencing Recruitment, Retention, and Adherence Rates in Exercise Interventions in ESKD: A Scoping Review
Malvika Agarwal1, Jamie Alexiuk2, Clara Bohm3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rational & Objective:
Majority of people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are sedentary, which increases risk for decreased quality and quantity of life. Development of exercise programs with characteristics that address individual preferences may increase interest in participating and completing exercise programs. We evaluated which exercise intervention characteristics affect exercise program recruitment, adherence, and completion in people with ESKD receiving dialysis.
Study Design:
Scoping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with searching of Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases through May 12, 2023.
Setting & Study Populations:
Adults with ESKD receiving dialysis.
Selection Criteria:
RCTs with exercise interventions of ≥12 weeks that included more than 10 people with ESKD receiving dialysis in each study arm.
Data Extraction:
One individual extracted data and the second author checked for accuracy.
Analytical Approach:
Data were synthesized qualitatively. Associations between intervention characteristics and recruitment, retention and adherence rates were assessed through one-way analysis of variance tests. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1.0 tool.
Results:
Of 7,396 studies identified, 55 studies with 3,269 trial participants were included. The majority of participants were male (63.2%) and treated with hemodialysis (89.1%). Mean age was 56 ± 11.5 years. Average recruitment, retention and adherence rates were 77.4%, 81.2%, and 76.0%, respectively. Only 27% of studies reported adherence rates. No significant associations were found between intervention characteristics (ie, exercise type, duration, frequency, setting, and supervision) and recruitment, adherence, and retention rates.
Limitations:
Data were limited by small sample size, suboptimal risk of bias, selective recruiting methods, and variability in definitions of adherence rates.
Conclusion:
Average recruitment, retention, and adherence rates in exercise interventions for patients receiving dialysis were high although less than 1 in 4 studies reported adherence rates. These results call for standardized reporting of recruitment, retention, and adherence rates in exercise interventions.
