Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Design Rational for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: An Update
Christopher E Gross1, Andrew R Hsu, Daniel J Scott
1From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (Gross and Scott), the University of California Irvine, Orange, CA (Hsu), and the Palomar Health Medical Group, San Diego, CA (Palanca).
None:
The design of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) systems is rapidly evolving as device companies try to keep pace with the expansion of surgical indications and a refinement of techniques for TAA. Even since the publication of the latest "update," published in 2018, three new designs and three updates on preexisting third-generation implants came onto the market. Improvements in third-generation TAA systems include minimal bone resection, retaining ligamentous support, and anatomic balancing. Fourth-generation systems use 3D printing technology, improved talus and tibia designs based on CT scans of arthritic and normal ankles, and include patient-specific instrumentation. We will then explore the short-term and mid-term outcomes of the previously discussed six TAA systems-INBONE, INFINITY, INVISION (Stryker), Salto-Talaris (Smith and Nephew), Scandinavian Total Ankle Arthroplasty (Enovis), Trabecular Metal Total Ankle (Zimmer Biomet), and VANTAGE (Exactech). As more research pours in regarding mid- to long-term outcomes of these implants, it is important to assess the design rationale and summarize current outcome data for these implants.

