Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025

05:39
Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published on: December 2, 2022
2.4K
Trait and plasticity evolution under competition and mutualism in evolving pairwise yeast communities.
ShengPei Wang1, Renuka Agarwal1, Kari A Segraves2
1Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Plos One
|January 15, 2025
Summary
Biotic interactions like competition and mutualism impact yeast evolution, affecting growth and resource use. However, these interactions had minimal effect on phenotypic plasticity evolution compared to abiotic factors.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Ecology
- Microbial Ecology
Background:
- Phenotypic plasticity evolution is well-understood for abiotic factors but less so for biotic interactions.
- Biotic interactions, such as competition and mutualism, are crucial drivers of evolutionary change.
- Understanding how these interactions shape trait evolution and plasticity is key to predicting ecological dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally investigate the effects of competition and mutualism on trait and plasticity evolution in brewer's yeast.
- To quantify evolutionary changes in growth rate and resource use efficiency (RUE) under different biotic conditions.
- To compare the evolutionary trajectories of yeast strains evolving alone, with a competitor, and with a mutualist.
Main Methods:
- Utilized genetically modified brewer's yeast in pairwise experimental communities.
- Quantified evolutionary changes in growth rate, RUE, and their plasticity.
- Compared evolved strains to ancestral strains under controlled conditions.
Main Results:
- Strains evolving alone showed decreased RUE and RUE plasticity, with a tradeoff between growth rate and efficiency.
- Competition led to higher growth rates, lower RUE, and a stronger growth-efficiency tradeoff.
- Mutualism resulted in lower growth rates, higher RUE, and a weaker tradeoff, with little impact on plasticity evolution for either interaction.
Conclusions:
- Biotic interactions significantly influence the evolution of growth rate and RUE in yeast.
- Competition and mutualism impose different selective pressures, leading to distinct evolutionary outcomes.
- Abiotic factors may play a more substantial role than biotic interactions in driving the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.
Related Concept Videos
Yeast Signaling
14.3K
Yeasts are single-celled organisms, but unlike bacteria, they are eukaryotes (cells with a nucleus). Cell signaling in yeast is similar to signaling in other eukaryotic cells. A ligand, such as a protein or a small molecule released from a yeast cell, attaches to a receptor on the cell surface. The binding stimulates second-messenger kinases to activate or inactivate transcription factors that further regulate gene expression. Many of the yeast intracellular signaling cascades have similar...
14.3K
Competition
21.4K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.4K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
58.0K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.0K

