Comparative Outcomes Between Three Different Techniques in the Fixation of Ulnar Styloid Fractures
Bariş Acar1, Osman Orman1, Mehmet Baydar2
1Hand Surgery, Baltalimani Special Hospital for Bone Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
Purpose:
This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different techniques used in the surgical treatment of ulnar styloid fractures.
Material And Method:
Ulnar styloid fractures treated surgically between 2012 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. There were three groups in the study: Group I (Kirschner wire, N= 19), Group II (tension band, N= 27) and Group III (headless compression screw, N= 25). The Gaulke classification was applied to categorise the fractures. After a follow-up period of at least one year, range of motion, Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QDASH), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and grip strength were measured. In addition, radiological union, bone resorption and dorsal subluxation of the DRUJ were evaluated.
Results:
There was no difference between the three groups in terms of demographic data. Gaulke type 2 A was more frequently observed in all three groups (47.4%, 74.1%, 64%, respectively). Range of motion (flexion, extension, supination, pronation) was similar in all three groups (p>0.05). QDASH and MMWS were similar in all three groups. Grip strength was significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (p=0.039). Radiological outcomes (nonunion, dorsal subluxation, bone resorption) were similar in all three groups. Implant irritation was significantly higher in Group II (p=0.026).
Conclusion:
K-wires, tension band wiring and headless compression screws yield similar clinical and radiological outcomes in the surgical treatment of unstable ulnar styloid fractures. However, the need for secondary surgery is more frequent when a tension band is used.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV.
