Factual Evidence on Digital Therapeutics in Pediatric Amblyopia: Insights into Rapid Axial Elongation Risk

Ying Yao1, Yunsi He1, Yun Wen1

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.

Ophthalmology
|January 15, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Digital therapeutics (DTx) may increase the risk of rapid axial elongation (RAE) in children with amblyopia. Careful monitoring of axial length is crucial during DTx therapy, especially for those with hyperopia.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Eye Care
  • Digital Health

Background:

  • Amblyopia, or "lazy eye," affects visual development in children.
  • Axial elongation is a key factor in myopia progression and ocular health.
  • Digital therapeutics (DTx) offer novel treatment modalities for various conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the association between daily digital therapeutics (DTx) and rapid axial elongation (RAE) in pediatric amblyopia patients.
  • To evaluate the risk of RAE in children with amblyopia receiving DTx therapy.
  • To analyze clinical data for the impact of DTx on axial length changes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study involving 1,394 children (3-12 years) with amblyopia.
  • 477 children received daily 30-minute vision therapy via DTx.
  • Cox proportional hazards models analyzed RAE risk, adjusted for multiple clinical factors.

Main Results:

  • Rapid axial elongation (RAE) occurred in 45.98% of children.
  • DTx use was associated with a 65% increased risk of RAE (HR, 1.65; P < 0.001).
  • This increased risk was consistent across subgroups, notably in children with hyperopia.

Conclusions:

  • Digital therapeutics are linked to a higher risk of RAE in children with amblyopia.
  • Close monitoring of axial length is essential during DTx treatment.
  • The benefits of DTx for visual acuity must be weighed against potential ocular growth impacts, especially in hyperopic or premyopic children.
Abstract