Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
Published on: October 5, 2020
Cost-utility and cost-benefit analysis of a multi-component intervention (NEXpro) for neck-related symptoms in Swiss
Beatrice Brunner1, Andrea Martina Aegerter2, Venerina Johnston3,4
1ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Background:
Neck pain is a significant public health issue, especially among office workers, with a prevalence ranging from 42 to 68%. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility and cost-benefit of a multi-component intervention targeting neck pain in the general population of office workers in Switzerland. The 12-week multi-component intervention consisted of neck exercises, health promotion information workshops, and workplace ergonomics sessions.
Methods:
The study was designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial and assessed using an employer's perspective. The main analysis focused on the immediate post-intervention period. Long-term effects were examined in a subsample at the 4, 8, and 12-month follow-ups. The intervention effects on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated using generalized linear mixed-effects models, controlling for confounding factors. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were presented, along with calculations of the break-even point and the return on investment. Various sensitivity analyses were performed.
Results:
A total of 120 office workers participated in the trial, with 100 completing the intervention period and 94 completing the entire study. The main analysis included 392 observations. The intervention had a significant positive effect on QALYs and a nonsignificant effect on costs. The ICER was estimated at -25,325 per QALY gain, and the probability of the intervention being cost saving was estimated at 88%. The break-even point was reached one week after the end of the intervention.
Conclusion:
The multi-component intervention is likely to reduce company costs and simultaneously improve the quality of life of employees. However, the implementation of such interventions critically depends on evidence of their cost-effectiveness. As there is still a large research gap in this area, future studies are needed.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04169646 . Registered 15 November 2019-Retrospectively registered.
Trial Protocol:
Aegerter AM, Deforth M, Johnston V, Ernst MJ, Volken T, Luomajoki H, et al. On-site multi-component intervention to improve productivity and reduce the economic and personal burden of neck pain in Swiss office-workers (NEXpro): protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):391. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03388-x .
More Related Videos
08:33Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024