Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Developmental screening tools for identification of children with developmental difficulties in high-income
Sara Cibralic1, Patrick Hawker2, Ferosa Khan2
1Ingham Institute, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Insights
This systematic review found that while developmental screening tools are feasible and acceptable, their accuracy varies. More research is needed to improve developmental surveillance and screening practices.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Universal developmental screening and surveillance are crucial for early identification of developmental delays.
- High-income countries increasingly utilize various tools for these purposes.
- Understanding the psychometric properties, acceptability, feasibility, and follow-up actions of these tools is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize the literature on universal developmental screening and surveillance tools in high-income countries.
- To evaluate the psychometric properties, knowledge, acceptability, and feasibility of these tools.
- To examine the follow-up actions taken after screening or surveillance.
Main Methods:
- A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was conducted using PsychInfo, PubMed, and Embase databases.
- Included studies evaluated universal developmental screening or surveillance tools, or reported on provider/parent views.
- Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers; results were synthesized qualitatively.
Main Results:
- 52 articles were included from 2,078 initial searches.
- The accuracy of screening tools varies across cultures and countries.
- Administering universal developmental screening tools appears feasible and acceptable, though supporting literature is limited.
- Few studies investigated actions taken following positive screening results.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence suggests variability in the accuracy of developmental screening tools.
- There is a need for further research on the acceptability, feasibility, and accuracy of developmental screeners.
- Improved understanding and research are necessary to optimize developmental surveillance and screening practices.
Objective:
To examine and synthesize the literature on the use of universal developmental screening and surveillance tools in high-income countries in relation to (1) psychometric properties; (2) knowledge, acceptability, and feasibility of tools; and (3) follow-up taken following screening/surveillance.
Method:
A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed in the PsychInfo, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies published in the English language were included if they reported results evaluating a universal developmental screening or surveillance measurement tool. Articles on service providers' and/or parents' views on developmental screening were also included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed for risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Tool. Results were synthesized qualitatively.
Results:
Initial searches identified 2,078 articles, of which 52 were included in the final review. Findings showed that several articles assessing the accuracy of screening tools have been published, and together, they suggest that the accuracy of screening tools varies across cultures and countries. Furthermore, available literature indicated that administering universal developmental screening tools was feasible and acceptable, though only a small number of studies are available. Results also showed a limited number of studies looking at actions taken following positive screening results.
Conclusion:
As the evidence stands, more research assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and accuracy of developmental screeners, is needed.
Systematic Review Registration:
This review has been registered with the University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=337320, registration number CRD42022337320).
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Intellectual Disability

